These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21936655)

  • 21. A choice-reaction time task utilizing congruent and incongruent colour/word stimuli: another reaction to Stroop.
    Head AS; Pedoe DS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Aug; 71(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 2235249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. You can't Stroop a lexical decision: is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 23205510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions.
    Aarts E; Roelofs A; van Turennout M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2089-99. PubMed ID: 19467359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Factors influencing Stroop performance in schizophrenia.
    Barch DM; Carter CS; Cohen JD
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Jul; 18(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 15291726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis.
    Steinhauser M; Hübner R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1398-412. PubMed ID: 19803645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cardiovascular response to Stroop: effect of verbal response and task difficulty.
    Boutcher YN; Boutcher SH
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct; 73(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 16730405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Decomposing the emotional Stroop effect.
    Frings C; Englert J; Wentura D; Bermeitinger C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 19691003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Don't be afraid of irrelevant words: the emotional Stroop effect is confined to attended words.
    Frings C; Wühr P
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(6):1056-68. PubMed ID: 22404379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Are some features easier to bind than others? The congruency effect.
    Goldfarb L; Treisman A
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 20483846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?
    Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):442-54. PubMed ID: 24387881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Event-related potentials with the Stroop colour-word task: timing of semantic conflict.
    Zurrón M; Pouso M; Lindín M; Galdo S; Díaz F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jun; 72(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 19171167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automatic perception and synaesthesia: evidence from colour and photism naming in a stroop-negative priming task.
    Lupiáñez J; Callejas A
    Cortex; 2006 Feb; 42(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 16683494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
    Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.
    Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 21517220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: effects of S-R association strength and relative timing.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):95-136. PubMed ID: 11216323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: a functional MRI study.
    van Veen V; Carter CS
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 15964208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Months in space: synaesthesia modulates attention and action.
    Diesendruck L; Gertner L; Botzer L; Goldfarb L; Karniel A; Henik A
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2010 Dec; 27(8):665-79. PubMed ID: 21846170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Task-defined associations are mode specific for selection of relevant dimension but mode independent for selection of location mapping.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):370-91. PubMed ID: 18609411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.