These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21936655)
21. A choice-reaction time task utilizing congruent and incongruent colour/word stimuli: another reaction to Stroop. Head AS; Pedoe DS Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Aug; 71(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 2235249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. You can't Stroop a lexical decision: is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative? Schmidt JR; Cheesman J; Besner D Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 23205510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions. Aarts E; Roelofs A; van Turennout M Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2089-99. PubMed ID: 19467359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Don't be afraid of irrelevant words: the emotional Stroop effect is confined to attended words. Frings C; Wühr P Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(6):1056-68. PubMed ID: 22404379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Are some features easier to bind than others? The congruency effect. Goldfarb L; Treisman A Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 20483846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced? Augustinova M; Ferrand L Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):442-54. PubMed ID: 24387881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Event-related potentials with the Stroop colour-word task: timing of semantic conflict. Zurrón M; Pouso M; Lindín M; Galdo S; Díaz F Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jun; 72(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 19171167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters. Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Automatic perception and synaesthesia: evidence from colour and photism naming in a stroop-negative priming task. Lupiáñez J; Callejas A Cortex; 2006 Feb; 42(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 16683494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference. Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance. Hutchison KA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 21517220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: effects of S-R association strength and relative timing. Lu CH; Proctor RW Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):95-136. PubMed ID: 11216323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: a functional MRI study. van Veen V; Carter CS Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 15964208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]