108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21936741)
1. Neural bases of human mate choice: multiple value dimensions, sex difference, and self-assessment system.
Funayama R; Sugiura M; Sassa Y; Jeong H; Wakusawa K; Horie K; Sato S; Kawashima R
Soc Neurosci; 2012; 7(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 21936741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preference for facial self-resemblance and attractiveness in human mate choice.
Kocsor F; Rezneki R; Juhász S; Bereczkei T
Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1263-70. PubMed ID: 21267643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neural and behavioral responses to attractiveness in adult and infant faces.
Hahn AC; Perrett DI
Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2014 Oct; 46 Pt 4():591-603. PubMed ID: 25199981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Men's judgments of women's facial attractiveness from two- and three-dimensional images are similar.
Tigue CC; Pisanski K; O'Connor JJ; Fraccaro PJ; Feinberg DR
J Vis; 2012 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 23132932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sociosexuality predicts women's preferences for symmetry in men's faces.
Quist MC; Watkins CD; Smith FG; Little AC; Debruine LM; Jones BC
Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Dec; 41(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 21882053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What do women's advertised mate preferences reveal? An analysis of video dating profiles.
Goetz CD
Evol Psychol; 2013 May; 11(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 23718946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Knowing your own mate value: sex-specific personality effects on the accuracy of expected mate choices.
Back MD; Penke L; Schmukle SC; Asendorpf JB
Psychol Sci; 2011 Aug; 22(8):984-9. PubMed ID: 21724949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
Arnocky S
Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond the memory mechanism: person-selective and nonselective processes in recognition of personally familiar faces.
Sugiura M; Mano Y; Sasaki A; Sadato N
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):699-715. PubMed ID: 20350171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Through evolution's eyes: extracting mate preferences by linking visual attention to adaptive design.
Krupp DB
Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Feb; 37(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 18157626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of a parenting prime on sex differences in mate selection criteria.
Millar MG; Ostlund NM
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1459-68. PubMed ID: 17030888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Risk-taking in adolescence: A neuroeconomics approach].
Barbalat G; Domenech P; Vernet M; Fourneret P
Encephale; 2010 Apr; 36(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 20434632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning from other people's experience: a neuroimaging study of decisional interactive-learning.
Canessa N; Motterlini M; Alemanno F; Perani D; Cappa SF
Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(1):353-62. PubMed ID: 21126586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distinct orbitofrontal regions encode stimulus and choice valuation.
Cunningham WA; Kesek A; Mowrer SM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):1956-66. PubMed ID: 18855544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mate choice decisions: the role of facial beauty.
Johnston VS
Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jan; 10(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 16311066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Salivary cortisol and pathogen disgust predict men's preferences for feminine shape cues in women's faces.
Jones BC; Fincher CL; Welling LL; Little AC; Feinberg DR; Watkins CD; Al-Dujaili EA; Debruine LM
Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 23182875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural mechanisms of dissonance: an fMRI investigation of choice justification.
Kitayama S; Chua HF; Tompson S; Han S
Neuroimage; 2013 Apr; 69():206-12. PubMed ID: 23238432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural bases of behavior selection without an objective correct answer.
Nakao T; Osumi T; Ohira H; Kasuya Y; Shinoda J; Yamada J
Neurosci Lett; 2009 Jul; 459(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19409960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Task-invariant brain responses to the social value of faces.
Todorov A; Said CP; Oosterhof NN; Engell AD
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):2766-81. PubMed ID: 21254805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
