These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21937195)

  • 1. Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews.
    Robinson KA; Saldanha IJ; McKoy NA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1325-30. PubMed ID: 21937195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions--agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program.
    Owens DK; Lohr KN; Atkins D; Treadwell JR; Reston JT; Bass EB; Chang S; Helfand M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):513-23. PubMed ID: 19595577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.
    Flynn MA; McNeil DA; Maloff B; Mutasingwa D; Wu M; Ford C; Tough SC
    Obes Rev; 2006 Feb; 7 Suppl 1():7-66. PubMed ID: 16371076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence summaries and synthesis: necessary but insufficient approach for determining clinical practice of integrated medicine?
    Coulter ID
    Integr Cancer Ther; 2006 Dec; 5(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 17101756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An introduction to an evidence-based approach to interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain.
    Manchikanti L; Singh V; Helm S; Schultz DM; Datta S; Hirsch JA;
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(4):E1-33. PubMed ID: 19668280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using evidence in pain practice: Part II: Interpreting and applying systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.
    Chou R
    Pain Med; 2008; 9(5):531-41. PubMed ID: 18346061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevention and self-management interventions are top priorities for osteoarthritis systematic reviews.
    Jaramillo A; Welch VA; Ueffing E; Gruen RL; Bragge P; Lyddiatt A; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):503-510.e4. PubMed ID: 22995854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A framework for best evidence approaches can improve the transparency of systematic reviews.
    Treadwell JR; Singh S; Talati R; McPheeters ML; Reston JT
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1159-62. PubMed ID: 23017634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.
    Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochrane systematic reviews are useful to map research gaps for decreasing maternal mortality.
    Chapman E; Reveiz L; Chambliss A; Sangalang S; Bonfill X
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 23177899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic reviews: grading recommendations and evidence quality.
    Robinson JK; Dellavalle RP; Bigby M; Callen JP
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 18209174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of research gaps from evidence-based guidelines: a pilot study in cystic fibrosis.
    Robinson KA; Saldanha IJ; McKoy NA
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Jul; 27(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 21756412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach.
    Cook DA; West CP
    Med Educ; 2012 Oct; 46(10):943-52. PubMed ID: 22989128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.