138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21937469)
1. Specification and other methods for determining morally relevant facts.
Rauprich O
J Med Ethics; 2011 Oct; 37(10):592-6. PubMed ID: 21937469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A waste of time: the problem of common morality in Principles of Biomedical Ethics.
Karlsen JR; Solbakk JH
J Med Ethics; 2011 Oct; 37(10):588-91. PubMed ID: 21937468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determining the common morality's norms in the sixth edition of Principles of Biomedical Ethics.
Herissone-Kelly P
J Med Ethics; 2011 Oct; 37(10):584-7. PubMed ID: 21937467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Common morality versus specified principlism: reply to Richardson.
Gert B; Culver CM; Clouser KD
J Med Philos; 2000 Jun; 25(3):308-22. PubMed ID: 11023380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The problem of 'thick in status, thin in content' in Beauchamp and Childress' principlism.
Lee MJ
J Med Ethics; 2010 Sep; 36(9):525-8. PubMed ID: 20817819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When four principles are too many: bloodgate, integrity and an action-guiding model of ethical decision making in clinical practice.
Muirhead W
J Med Ethics; 2012 Apr; 38(4):195-6. PubMed ID: 22074770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [On the applicability of the North American principlism].
Requena Meana P
Cuad Bioet; 2008; 19(65):11-27. PubMed ID: 18402227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Not just autonomy--the principles of American biomedical ethics.
Holm S
J Med Ethics; 1995 Dec; 21(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 8778456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 30 years Principles of biomedical ethics: introduction to a symposium on the 6th edition of Tom L Beauchamp and James F Childress' seminal work.
Rauprich O; Vollmann J
J Med Ethics; 2011 Aug; 37(8):454-5. PubMed ID: 21772037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The method of 'principlism': a critique of the critique.
Lustig BA
J Med Philos; 1992 Oct; 17(5):487-510. PubMed ID: 1431666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to Deal with Counter-Examples to Common Morality Theory: A Surprising Result.
Herissone-Kelly P
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2022 Apr; 31(2):185-191. PubMed ID: 35243976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pragmatic principles--methodological pragmatism in the principle-based approach to bioethics.
Schmidt-Felzmann H
J Med Philos; 2003; 28(5-6):581-96. PubMed ID: 14972762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hurrah for empirical bioethics (where hermeneutically clarified) or how perception of facts 'depends' on values.
Schultz DS
Am J Bioeth; 2009; 9(6-7):95-9. PubMed ID: 19998136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Virtues and Principles in Biomedical Ethics.
Garcia JLA
J Med Philos; 2020 Jul; 45(4-5):471-503. PubMed ID: 32726807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Principlism's Balancing Act: Why the Principles of Biomedical Ethics Need a Theory of the Good.
Shea M
J Med Philos; 2020 Jul; 45(4-5):441-470. PubMed ID: 32726809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dignity and the Founding Myth of Bioethics.
Reis-Dennis S
Hastings Cent Rep; 2023 Mar; 53(2):26-35. PubMed ID: 37092650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What really separates casuistry from principlism in biomedical ethics.
Cudney P
Theor Med Bioeth; 2014 Jun; 35(3):205-29. PubMed ID: 24846659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Respect: or, how respect for persons became respect for autonomy.
Lysaught MT
J Med Philos; 2004 Dec; 29(6):665-80. PubMed ID: 15590515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When the universal is particular: a re-examination of the common morality using the work of Charles Taylor.
Bach MC
Med Health Care Philos; 2022 Mar; 25(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 34787770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is the Common Morality, Really?
Bautz B
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2016 Mar; 26(1):29-45. PubMed ID: 27157110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
