These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21939169)

  • 1. Review of advantages of Joel-Cohen surgical abdominal incision in caesarean section: a basic science perspective.
    Karanth KL; Sathish N
    Med J Malaysia; 2010 Sep; 65(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 21939169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section.
    Mathai M; Hofmeyr GJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jan; (1):CD004453. PubMed ID: 17253508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section.
    Mathai M; Hofmeyr GJ; Mathai NE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 May; (5):CD004453. PubMed ID: 23728648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative evaluation of the Joel-Cohen cesarean section versus the transrectal incision].
    Le Dû R; Bernardini M; Agostini A; Mazouni C; Shojai R; Blanc B; Gamerre M; Bretelle F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Sep; 36(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 17335999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between the use of the Joel-Cohen incision and its modification during Stark's cesarean section.
    Malvasi A; Tinelli A; Serio G; Tinelli R; Casciaro S; Cavallotti C
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Oct; 20(10):757-61. PubMed ID: 17763278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal infection rates after cesarean delivery by Pfannenstiel or Joel-Cohen incision: a multicenter surveillance study.
    Dumas AM; Girard R; Ayzac L; Caillat-Vallet E; Tissot-Guerraz F; Vincent-Bouletreau A; Berland M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 19864051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified Joel-Cohen technique for caesarean delivery.
    Wallin G; Fall O
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Mar; 106(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10426640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized clinical trial of two surgical techniques for cesarean section.
    Franchi M; Ghezzi F; Balestreri D; Beretta P; Maymon E; Miglierina M; Bolis PF
    Am J Perinatol; 1998; 15(10):589-94. PubMed ID: 9926882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Techniques for cesarean section.
    Hofmeyr JG; Novikova N; Mathai M; Shah A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):431-44. PubMed ID: 19879392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized comparative study on modified Joel-Cohen incision versus Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean section.
    Saha SP; Bhattarcharjee N; Das Mahanta S; Naskar A; Bhattacharyya SK
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2013; 14(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24592067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is inferior dissection of the rectus sheath necessary during Pfannenstiel incision for lower segment Caesarean section? A randomised controlled trial.
    Kadir RA; Khan A; Wilcock F; Chapman L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006; 128(1-2):262-6. PubMed ID: 16621227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Misgav Ladach method: a step forward in the operative technique of caesarean section.
    Poonam ; Banerjee B; Singh SN; Raina A
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2006; 4(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 18603898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joel-Cohen or Pfannenstiel incision at cesarean delivery: does it make a difference?
    Franchi M; Ghezzi F; Raio L; Di Naro E; Miglierina M; Agosti M; Bolis P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Nov; 81(11):1040-6. PubMed ID: 12421172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Joel-Cohen-based technique and the transverse Pfannenstiel for caesarean section for safety and effectiveness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Olyaeemanesh A; Bavandpour E; Mobinizadeh M; Ashrafinia M; Bavandpour M; Nouhi M
    Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2017; 31():54. PubMed ID: 29445683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misgav-Ladach cesarean section: general consideration.
    Fatusić Z; Hudić I; Musić A
    Acta Clin Croat; 2011 Mar; 50(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 22034788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Caesarean section: could different transverse abdominal incision techniques influence postpartum pain and subsequent quality of life? A systematic review.
    Gizzo S; Andrisani A; Noventa M; Di Gangi S; Quaranta M; Cosmi E; D'Antona D; Nardelli GB; Ambrosini G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0114190. PubMed ID: 25646621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Caesarean deliveries by Pfannenstiel versus Joel-Cohen incision: A randomised controlled trial.
    Abuelghar WM; El-Bishry G; Emam LH
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2013; 14(4):194-200. PubMed ID: 24592105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Techniques for performing caesarean section.
    Hema KR; Johanson R
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Feb; 15(1):17-47. PubMed ID: 11359313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Stark's method of cesarean section. Advantages compared to the traditional method].
    Corosu R; Roma B; Vizzaccaro F; Franchi M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1999 May; 51(5):203-5. PubMed ID: 10431531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized controlled study of peritoneal closure at cesarean section.
    Galaal KA; Krolikowski A
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):759-61. PubMed ID: 11423890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.