These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21939367)

  • 1. Effects of visual cue and response assignment on spatial stimulus coding in stimulus-response compatibility.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 21939367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hierarchical knowledge influences stimulus-response compatibility effects.
    Tlauka M; McKenna FP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):85-103. PubMed ID: 10718065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial stimulus response compatibility for a horizontal visual display with hand and foot controls.
    Chan KW; Chan AH
    Ergonomics; 2011 Mar; 54(3):233-45. PubMed ID: 21390953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Representing response position relative to display location: influence on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jul; 58(5):839-64. PubMed ID: 16194938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of response eccentricity and relative position on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility with joystick and keypress responses.
    Proctor RW; Cho YS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 12613566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response preparation modulates interference from irrelevant spatial information.
    Wühr P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jun; 122(2):206-20. PubMed ID: 16466683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive interference and aging: insights from a spatial stimulus-response consistency task.
    Juncos-Rabadán O; Pereiro AX; Facal D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 17601480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Coding specificity of orthogonal S-R compatibility].
    Kleinsorge T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(4):249-64. PubMed ID: 10551040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
    Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining priority between attentional and referential-coding sources of the Simon effect through optokinetic stimulation.
    Figliozzi F; Silvetti M; Rubichi S; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):1011-5. PubMed ID: 19961865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing.
    Stins JF; Michaels CF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):569-89. PubMed ID: 10881619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in cue-dependent spatial navigation may be revealed by in-depth swimming analysis.
    Harvey DR; Brant L; Commins S
    Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 19576274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of visual signals on spatial decision making.
    Danziger S; Rafal R
    Cognition; 2009 Feb; 110(2):182-97. PubMed ID: 19121825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Manual tapping enhances visual short-term memory performance where visual and motor coordinates correspond.
    Sapkota RP; Pardhan S; van der Linde I
    Br J Psychol; 2013 May; 104(2):249-64. PubMed ID: 23560670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.