These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21939368)

  • 1. Consensus collaboration enhances group and individual recall accuracy.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):179-94. PubMed ID: 21939368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 22686851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does test delay eliminate collaborative inhibition?
    Takahashi M; Saito S
    Memory; 2004 Nov; 12(6):722-31. PubMed ID: 15724361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.
    Congleton AR; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):535-51. PubMed ID: 21744986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2008 Apr; 16(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 18324549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Collaborative remembering revisited: Study context access modulates collaborative inhibition and later benefits for individual memory.
    Abel M; Bäuml KT
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1319-1334. PubMed ID: 28770540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists.
    Hyman IE; Cardwell BA; Roy RA
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):875-90. PubMed ID: 23439153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item-specific encoding produces an additional benefit of directed forgetting: evidence from intrusion errors.
    Sahakyan L; Delaney PF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1346-54. PubMed ID: 20804302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximizing the benefits and minimizing the costs of repeated memory tests for older adults.
    Henkel LA
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):250-62. PubMed ID: 18573001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collaborative remembering of emotional events: the case of Rabin's assassination.
    Yaron-Antar A; Nachson I
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 16423741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Children's collaborative recall of shared and unshared information.
    Gummerum M; Leman PJ; Hollins TS
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2013 Sep; 31(Pt 3):302-17. PubMed ID: 23901844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of multiple trials and computer-mediated communication on collaborative and individual semantic recall.
    Hinds JM; Payne SJ
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):415-423. PubMed ID: 28750599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does retrieval strategy disruption cause general and specific collaborative inhibition?
    Dahlström Ö; Danielsson H; Emilsson M; Andersson J
    Memory; 2011 Feb; 19(2):140-54. PubMed ID: 21331969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of the timing and identity of retrieval cues in individual recall: an attempt to mimic cross-cueing in collaborative recall.
    Andersson J; Hitch G; Meudell P
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 16423746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collaboration enhances later individual memory for emotional material.
    Bärthel GA; Wessel I; Huntjens RJ; Verwoerd J
    Memory; 2017 May; 25(5):636-646. PubMed ID: 27403926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contributions of encoding, retention, and recall to the Hebb effect.
    Oberauer K; Meyer N
    Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):774-81. PubMed ID: 19598058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collaborative recall of details of an emotional film.
    Wessel I; Zandstra AR; Hengeveld HM; Moulds ML
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):437-44. PubMed ID: 24628679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collaborative recall in face-to-face and electronic groups.
    Ekeocha JO; Brennan SE
    Memory; 2008 Apr; 16(3):245-61. PubMed ID: 18324550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Collaborative inhibition is due to the product, not the process, of recalling in groups.
    Wright DB; Klumpp A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1080-3. PubMed ID: 15875979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.