BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21940047)

  • 1. Evidence supporting restrictions on uses of body diagrams in forensic interviews.
    Poole DA; Dickinson JJ
    Child Abuse Negl; 2011 Sep; 35(9):659-69. PubMed ID: 21940047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of disclosure history and body diagrams on children's reports of inappropriate touching: Evidence from a new analog paradigm.
    Dickinson JJ; Poole DA
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 27442139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigative Interviewing of Aboriginal Children in Cases of Suspected Sexual Abuse.
    Hamilton G; Brubacher SP; Powell MB
    J Child Sex Abus; 2016; 25(4):363-81. PubMed ID: 27266534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A national survey of child forensic interviewers: Implications for research, practice, and law.
    Fessinger MB; McAuliff BD
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 44(2):113-127. PubMed ID: 32175750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of interviewers' supportive comments and children's reluctance to cooperate during sexual abuse disclosure.
    Lewy J; Cyr M; Dion J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2015 May; 43():112-22. PubMed ID: 25816755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tele-forensic interviewing can be a reasonable alternative to face-to-face interviewing of child witnesses.
    Dickinson JJ; Lytle NE; Poole DA
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):97-111. PubMed ID: 34110872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Searching for Truth: The Forensic Interviewer's Use of an Assessment Approach While Conducting Child Sexual Abuse Interviews.
    Duron JF
    J Child Sex Abus; 2020; 29(2):183-204. PubMed ID: 29932818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Children's use of sexual body part terms in witness interviews about sexual abuse.
    Burrows KS; Bearman M; Dion J; Powell MB
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Mar; 65():226-235. PubMed ID: 28189960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Children's performance on ground rules questions: implications for forensic interviewing.
    Dickinson JJ; Brubacher SP; Poole DA
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 25642973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Support and reluctance in the pre-substantive phase of alleged child abuse victim investigative interviews: revised versus standard NICHD protocols.
    Ahern EC; Hershkowitz I; Lamb ME; Blasbalg U; Winstanley A
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 25418845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-Reported Current Practices in Child Forensic Interviewing: Training, Tools, and Pre-Interview Preparation.
    Rivard JR; Schreiber Compo N
    Behav Sci Law; 2017 May; 35(3):253-268. PubMed ID: 28581153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children.
    Earhart B; La Rooy DJ; Brubacher SP; Lamb ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):746-61. PubMed ID: 25424612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial language, question type, and young children's ability to describe clothing: Legal and developmental implications.
    Stolzenberg SN; McWilliams K; Lyon TD
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Aug; 41(4):398-409. PubMed ID: 28150976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do Prosecutors Use Interview Instructions or Build Rapport with Child Witnesses?
    Ahern EC; Stolzenberg SN; Lyon TD
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Aug; 33(4):476-92. PubMed ID: 26206485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facilitating the Expression of Emotions by Alleged Victims of Child Abuse During Investigative Interviews Using the Revised NICHD Protocol.
    Karni-Visel Y; Hershkowitz I; Lamb ME; Blasbalg U
    Child Maltreat; 2019 Aug; 24(3):310-318. PubMed ID: 30879346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Interviewer Support on Children's Memory and Suggestibility: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Experimental Research.
    Saywitz KJ; Wells CR; Larson RP; Hobbs SD
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2019 Jan; 20(1):22-39. PubMed ID: 30803408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Talking past each other: Interviewer and child verbal exchanges in forensic interviews.
    Wolfman M; Brown D; Jose P
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Apr; 40(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 26844909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual abuse and preschoolers: Forensic details in regard of question types.
    Gagnon K; Cyr M
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 May; 67():109-118. PubMed ID: 28254688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Repeated Questioning on Interviewers: Learning From a Forensic Interview Training Project.
    Duron JF; Cheung M
    J Child Sex Abus; 2016; 25(4):347-62. PubMed ID: 27266533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Responses to Substantive Transition Prompts in Interviews With Children.
    Earhart B; Danby MC; Brubacher SP; Powell MB; Sharman S
    Child Maltreat; 2018 Aug; 23(3):221-225. PubMed ID: 29466881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.