315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21940542)
1. Using focused missed-case conferences to reduce discrepancies in musculoskeletal studies interpreted by residents on call.
Itri JN; Kang HC; Krishnan S; Nathan D; Scanlon MH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):W696-705. PubMed ID: 21940542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On-call musculoskeletal radiographs: discrepancy rates between radiology residents and musculoskeletal radiologists.
Kung JW; Melenevsky Y; Hochman MG; Didolkar MM; Yablon CM; Eisenberg RL; Wu JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 200(4):856-9. PubMed ID: 23521460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using a web-based application to enhance resident training and improve performance on-call.
Itri JN; Redfern RO; Scanlon MH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):917-20. PubMed ID: 20447839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Orion: a web-based application designed to monitor resident and fellow performance on-call.
Itri JN; Kim W; Scanlon MH
J Digit Imaging; 2011 Oct; 24(5):897-907. PubMed ID: 21249419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies.
Cooper VF; Goodhartz LA; Nemcek AA; Ryu RK
Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18692761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Missed Case Feedback and Quality Assurance Conferences in Radiology Resident Education: A Survey of United States Radiology Program Directors.
Gill AE; Wong PK; Mullins ME; Corey AS; Little BP
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018; 47(4):209-214. PubMed ID: 28688532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight.
Ruutiainen AT; Durand DJ; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
Acad Radiol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 23452475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On-Call Radiology Resident Discrepancies: Categorization by Patient Location and Severity.
Mellnick V; Raptis C; McWilliams S; Picus D; Wahl R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 27319372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying benchmarks for discrepancy rates in preliminary interpretations provided by radiology trainees at an academic institution.
Ruutiainen AT; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Sep; 8(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 21889753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Etiology and disposition associated with radiology discrepancies on emergency department patients.
Gergenti L; Olympia RP
Am J Emerg Med; 2019 Nov; 37(11):2015-2019. PubMed ID: 30799026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The discrepancy rate between preliminary and official reports of emergency radiology studies: a performance indicator and quality improvement method.
Issa G; Taslakian B; Itani M; Hitti E; Batley N; Saliba M; El-Merhi F
Acta Radiol; 2015 May; 56(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 24833644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Residents managed trauma adequately using their own radiological interpretation as compared with "nighthawk" radiologists.
Ahmed N; Guo A; Elhassan H; Qaiser R; Chung R
J Trauma; 2006 Sep; 61(3):555-6; discussion 556-7. PubMed ID: 16966986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiology resident preliminary reporting in an independent call environment: multiyear assessment of volume, timeliness, and accuracy.
Weinberg BD; Richter MD; Champine JG; Morriss MC; Browning T
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jan; 12(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 25557573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of the RADPEER™ scoring language to interpretation discrepancies between diagnostic radiology residents and faculty radiologists.
Maloney E; Lomasney LM; Schomer L
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Apr; 9(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 22469377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrepancies in interpretation of ED body computed tomographic scans by radiology residents.
Tieng N; Grinberg D; Li SF
Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Jan; 25(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 17157681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overnight resident interpretation of torso CT at a level 1 trauma center an analysis and review of the literature.
Chung JH; Strigel RM; Chew AR; Albrecht E; Gunn ML
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1155-60. PubMed ID: 19481962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Opportunities for Targeted Education: Critical Neuroradiologic Findings Missed or Misinterpreted by Residents and Fellows.
Huntley JH; Carone M; Yousem DM; Babiarz LS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1155-9. PubMed ID: 26587919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrepancy rates of radiology resident interpretations of on-call neuroradiology MR imaging studies.
Filippi CG; Schneider B; Burbank HN; Alsofrom GF; Linnell G; Ratkovits B
Radiology; 2008 Dec; 249(3):972-9. PubMed ID: 19011191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of training and experience in interpretation of emergency body CT scans.
Wechsler RJ; Spettell CM; Kurtz AB; Lev-Toaff AS; Halpern EJ; Nazarian LN; Feld RI; Needleman L; Alexander AA
Radiology; 1996 Jun; 199(3):717-20. PubMed ID: 8637994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
