109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21942312)
1. Effects of camera arrangement on perceptual-motor performance in minimally invasive surgery.
Delucia PR; Griswold JA
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Sep; 17(3):210-32. PubMed ID: 21942312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using movement parallax for 3D laparoscopy.
Voorhorst FA; Overbeeke KJ; Smets GJ
Med Prog Technol; 1996-1997; 21(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 9110279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures.
Gallagher AG; Smith CD; Bowers SP; Seymour NE; Pearson A; McNatt S; Hananel D; Satava RM
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Sep; 197(3):479-88. PubMed ID: 12946803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bimanual coordination in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: comparing the conventional dual-channel endoscope, the R-Scope, and a novel direct-drive system.
Spaun GO; Zheng B; Martinec DV; Cassera MA; Dunst CM; Swanström LL
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 May; 69(6):e39-45. PubMed ID: 19410036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward effective pediatric minimally invasive surgical simulation.
Hamilton JM; Kahol K; Vankipuram M; Ashby A; Notrica DM; Ferrara JJ
J Pediatr Surg; 2011 Jan; 46(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 21238655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sideways camera rotations of 90° and 135° result in poorer performance of laparoscopic tasks for novices.
Klein MI; Wheeler NJ; Craig C
Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):246-61. PubMed ID: 25850156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures.
Gallagher AG; Satava RM
Surg Endosc; 2002 Dec; 16(12):1746-52. PubMed ID: 12140641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of experience and camera holding on laparoscopic instrument movements measured with the TrEndo tracking system.
Chmarra MK; Kolkman W; Jansen FW; Grimbergen CA; Dankelman J
Surg Endosc; 2007 Nov; 21(11):2069-75. PubMed ID: 17479335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: laparoscopy versus robotics.
Nezhat F
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2 Suppl):S29-32. PubMed ID: 18762326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comprehensive review of anti-reflux procedures completed by computer-assisted tele-surgery.
Aurora AR; Talamini MA
Minerva Chir; 2004 Oct; 59(5):417-25. PubMed ID: 15494669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative evaluation of three advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies: a stereo endoscope, an image projection display, and a TFT display.
Wentink M; Jakimowicz JJ; Vos LM; Meijer DW; Wieringa PA
Surg Endosc; 2002 Aug; 16(8):1237-41. PubMed ID: 11984691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trocars: safety and selection. Emergency Care Research Institute.
Health Devices; 1998 Nov; 27(11):376-99. PubMed ID: 9859030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive fusion: summary statement.
Guyer RD; Foley KT; Phillips FM; Ball PA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15 Suppl):S44. PubMed ID: 12897473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills.
Rosen J; Hannaford B; Richards CG; Sinanan MN
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 May; 48(5):579-91. PubMed ID: 11341532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Total hip replacement from a MIS-AL approach (comparison with a standard anterolateral approach)].
Kubes J; Landor I; Podskubka A; Majernícek M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Aug; 76(4):288-94. PubMed ID: 19755052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of using laparoscopic instruments on muscle activation patterns during minimally invasive surgical training procedures.
Quick NE; Gillette JC; Shapiro R; Adrales GL; Gerlach D; Park AE
Surg Endosc; 2003 Mar; 17(3):462-5. PubMed ID: 12399872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of different viewing conditions on performance in simulated minimal access surgery.
Hubber JW; Taffinder N; Russell RC; Darzi A
Ergonomics; 2003 Aug; 46(10):999-1016. PubMed ID: 12850936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing cognitive & motor performance in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for training & tool design.
Cristancho SM; Hodgson AJ; Pachev G; Nagy A; Panton N; Qayumi K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():108-13. PubMed ID: 16404027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Video-based assistance system for training in minimally invasive surgery.
Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM; Pagador JB; Gómez EJ; Sánchez-González P; Usón J; Moreno J
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2011 Jul; 20(4):197-205. PubMed ID: 21091379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Task analysis of laparoscopic camera control schemes.
Ellis RD; Munaco AJ; Reisner LA; Klein MD; Composto AM; Pandya AK; King BW
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Dec; 12(4):576-584. PubMed ID: 26648563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
