These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21942496)

  • 1. Illusory expectations can affect retrieval-monitoring accuracy.
    McDonough IM; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):391-404. PubMed ID: 21942496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
    Pierce BH; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of study context on item recollection.
    Skinner EI; Fernandes MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1318-34. PubMed ID: 19890765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrieval monitoring and anosognosia in Alzheimer's disease.
    Gallo DA; Chen JM; Wiseman AL; Schacter DL; Budson AE
    Neuropsychology; 2007 Sep; 21(5):559-68. PubMed ID: 17784804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the relationships among item recognition, source recognition, and recall from an individual differences perspective.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1578-85. PubMed ID: 19857028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are pictures good for learning new vocabulary in a foreign language? Only if you think they are not.
    Carpenter SK; Olson KM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 21787105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stress facilitates consolidation of verbal memory for a film but does not affect retrieval.
    Beckner VE; Tucker DM; Delville Y; Mohr DC
    Behav Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 120(3):518-27. PubMed ID: 16768603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prefrontal activity and diagnostic monitoring of memory retrieval: FMRI of the criterial recollection task.
    Gallo DA; Kensinger EA; Schacter DL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):135-48. PubMed ID: 16417689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating source memory decisions in the prefrontal cortex: fMRI of diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring.
    Gallo DA; McDonough IM; Scimeca J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):955-69. PubMed ID: 19413478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection.
    Herron JE; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 14511537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
    Mate J; Baqués J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Context affects feeling-of-knowing accuracy in younger and older adults.
    Thomas AK; Bulevich JB; Dubois SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):96-108. PubMed ID: 21058877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Illusory correlations revisited: the role of pseudocontingencies and working-memory capacity.
    Eder AB; Fiedler K; Hamm-Eder S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):517-32. PubMed ID: 21218370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. fMRI evidence for separable and lateralized prefrontal memory monitoring processes.
    Dobbins IG; Simons JS; Schacter DL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):908-20. PubMed ID: 15298779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection.
    Wais PE; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 18004949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates.
    Voss JL; Lucas HD; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2638-51. PubMed ID: 19702474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks.
    Loaiza VM; McCabe DP; Youngblood JL; Rose NS; Myerson J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1258-63. PubMed ID: 21707214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Illusory recollection and dual-process models of recognition memory.
    Higham PA; Vokey JR
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 May; 57(4):714-44. PubMed ID: 15204130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.