These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21943833)

  • 1. Global precedence effect in audition and vision: evidence for similar cognitive styles across modalities.
    Bouvet L; Rousset S; Valdois S; Donnadieu S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Oct; 138(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 21943833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ceponiene R; Westerfield M; Torki M; Townsend J
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():53-68. PubMed ID: 18482717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting.
    Bresciani JP; Ernst MO
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1157-61. PubMed ID: 17589318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does aging affect the allocation of visual attention in global and local information processing?
    Roux F; Ceccaldi M
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Aug; 46(3):383-96. PubMed ID: 11487288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nicotine receptor gene CHRNA4 modulates early event-related potentials in auditory and visual oddball target detection tasks.
    Espeseth T; Endestad T; Rootwelt H; Reinvang I
    Neuroscience; 2007 Jul; 147(4):974-85. PubMed ID: 17590520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-modal emotional attention: emotional voices modulate early stages of visual processing.
    Brosch T; Grandjean D; Sander D; Scherer KR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1670-9. PubMed ID: 18767920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic crossmodal links revealed by steady-state responses in auditory-visual divided attention.
    de Jong R; Toffanin P; Harbers M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jan; 75(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 19819271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
    Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multisensory executive functioning.
    Hunt AR; Kingstone A
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):325-7. PubMed ID: 15177806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audiovisual prior entry.
    Zampini M; Shore DI; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Jun; 381(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15896473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
    Beer AL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensory load incurs conceptual processing costs.
    Vermeulen N; Corneille O; Niedenthal PM
    Cognition; 2008 Nov; 109(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 18996513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning directions of objects specified by vision, spatial audition, or auditory spatial language.
    Klatzky RL; Lippa Y; Loomis JM; Golledge RG
    Learn Mem; 2002; 9(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 12464695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing.
    Burton MW; Locasto PC; Krebs-Noble D; Gullapalli RP
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):647-61. PubMed ID: 15955475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.