251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21943945)
1. High resolution intra-operative two-dimensional specimen mammography and its impact on second operation for re-excision of positive margins at final pathology after breast conservation surgery.
Bathla L; Harris A; Davey M; Sharma P; Silva E
Am J Surg; 2011 Oct; 202(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 21943945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of the use of specimen mammography in breast conservation therapy.
McCormick JT; Keleher AJ; Tikhomirov VB; Budway RJ; Caushaj PF
Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4):433-6. PubMed ID: 15474443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiography of the surgical specimen in early stage breast lesions: diagnostic reliability in the analysis of the resection margins.
Ciccarelli G; Di Virgilio MR; Menna S; Garretti L; Ala A; Giani R; Bussone R; Canavese G; Berardengo E
Radiol Med; 2007 Apr; 112(3):366-76. PubMed ID: 17440696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of intra-operative specimen radiographs on specimen weights for wide local excision of breast cancer.
Carmichael AR; Ninkovic G; Boparai R
Breast; 2004 Aug; 13(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 15325668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of intraoperative digital specimen mammography versus conventional specimen radiography for the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Kim SH; Cornacchi SD; Heller B; Farrokhyar F; Babra M; Lovrics PJ
Am J Surg; 2013 Jun; 205(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 23465329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?
Jacobson AF; Asad J; Boolbol SK; Osborne MP; Boachie-Adjei K; Feldman SM
Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 18809063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of positive margins after breast-conserving surgery: a retrospective review.
Saadai P; Moezzi M; Menes T
Breast Cancer; 2011 Jul; 18(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 21465227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographically guided shave margins may reduce lumpectomy re-excision rates.
Larson KE; Jadeja P; Marko A; Jadeja V; Pratt D
Breast J; 2018 Sep; 24(5):820-822. PubMed ID: 29687530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of introducing an in-theatre intra-operative specimen radiography (IOSR) system on the management of palpable breast cancer within a single unit.
Layfield DM; May DJ; Cutress RI; Richardson C; Agrawal A; Wise M; Yiangou C
Breast; 2012 Aug; 21(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 22119488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does three-dimensional intraoperative specimen imaging reduce the need for re-excision in breast cancer patients? A prospective cohort study.
Chagpar AB; Butler M; Killelea BK; Horowitz NR; Stavris K; Lannin DR
Am J Surg; 2015 Nov; 210(5):886-90. PubMed ID: 26255230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Defining the clinical target volume for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation: a pathologic analysis.
Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):722-30. PubMed ID: 15465188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Obtaining adequate surgical margin status in breast-conservation therapy: intraoperative ultrasound-guided resection versus specimen mammography.
Pop MM; Cristian S; Hanko-Bauer O; Ghiga DV; Georgescu R
Clujul Med; 2018; 91(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 29785158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of frozen-section analysis of sentinel lymph node and lumpectomy margin status on reoperation rates in patients undergoing breast-conservation therapy.
McLaughlin SA; Ochoa-Frongia LM; Patil SM; Cody HS; Sclafani LM
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jan; 206(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 18155571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
