BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

544 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21944573)

  • 1. Primary maternity care reform: whose influence is driving the change?
    McIntyre M; Francis K; Chapman Y
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):e705-11. PubMed ID: 21944573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The struggle for contested boundaries in the move to collaborative care teams in Australian maternity care.
    McIntyre M; Francis K; Chapman Y
    Midwifery; 2012 Jun; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 21993203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Australian maternity reform through clinical redesign.
    Hartz DL; White J; Lainchbury KA; Gunn H; Jarman H; Welsh AW; Challis D; Tracy SK
    Aust Health Rev; 2012 May; 36(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 22624638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety of non-medically led primary maternity care models: a critical review of the international literature.
    McIntyre MJ
    Aust Health Rev; 2012 May; 36(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 22624633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing a Core Competency Model and Educational Framework for Primary Maternity Services: a national consensus approach.
    Homer CS; Griffiths M; Brodie PM; Kildea S; Curtin AM; Ellwood DA
    Women Birth; 2012 Sep; 25(3):122-7. PubMed ID: 21856261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health-care professionals' views about safety in maternity services: a qualitative study.
    Smith AH; Dixon AL; Page LA
    Midwifery; 2009 Feb; 25(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 19095334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Birth centres and the national maternity services review: response to consumer demand or compromise?
    Dahlen H; Jackson M; Schmied V; Tracy S; Priddis H
    Women Birth; 2011 Dec; 24(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 21167799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Models of maternity care in rural environments: barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives.
    Munro S; Kornelsen J; Grzybowski S
    Midwifery; 2013 Jun; 29(6):646-52. PubMed ID: 22863239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National review of maternity services 2008: women influencing change.
    McIntyre MJ; Francis K; Chapman Y
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2011 Jul; 11():53. PubMed ID: 21762522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How midwives' discursive practices contribute to the maintenance of the status quo in English maternity care.
    Pollard KC
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):612-9. PubMed ID: 20692743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Midwives' perceptions of their role within the context of maternity service reform: An Appreciative Inquiry.
    Sidebotham M; Fenwick J; Rath S; Gamble J
    Women Birth; 2015 Jun; 28(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 25582894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in the NHS.
    Kenyon C; Nelson A
    Pract Midwife; 2013 Apr; 16(4):10, 12-5. PubMed ID: 23687870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Liberating maternity services.
    Truttero S
    Pract Midwife; 2010 Nov; 13(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 21155463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.
    Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J
    Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating the potential for evidence-based midwifery-led services in very remote Australia: viewpoints from local stakeholders.
    Quinn E; Noble J; Seale H; Ward JE
    Women Birth; 2013 Dec; 26(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 24012012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Have the 2010 national maternity reforms delivered choice, control and continuity to Australian women?
    Teakle B
    Women Birth; 2013 Jun; 26(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 23642294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Midwives at the heart of maternity care changes.
    Kearney G
    Aust Nurs J; 2008 Oct; 16(4):1. PubMed ID: 19013959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Small rural maternity units without caesarean delivery capabilities: is it safe and sustainable in the eyes of health professionals in Tasmania?
    Hoang H; Le Q; Kilpatrick S
    Rural Remote Health; 2012; 12():1941. PubMed ID: 22808931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Home birth and the National Australian Maternity Services Review: too hot to handle?
    Dahlen H; Schmied V; Tracy SK; Jackson M; Cummings J; Priddis H
    Women Birth; 2011 Dec; 24(4):148-55. PubMed ID: 21074508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding factors affecting collaboration between midwives and other health care professionals in a birth center and its affiliated Quebec hospital: a case study.
    Behruzi R; Klam S; Dehertog M; Jimenez V; Hatem M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jun; 17(1):200. PubMed ID: 28651552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.