These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21945341)

  • 1. Iterative design and testing of a hand-held, non-contact wound measurement device.
    Sprigle S; Nemeth M; Gajjala A
    J Tissue Viability; 2012 Feb; 21(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 21945341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).
    Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques.
    Haghpanah S; Bogie K; Wang X; Banks PG; Ho CH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1396-402. PubMed ID: 17023252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement.
    Thawer HA; Houghton PE; Woodbury MG; Keast D; Campbell K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):46-53. PubMed ID: 12378003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of wound measuring techniques in an outpatient wound center.
    Bryant JL; Brooks TL; Schmidt B; Mostow EN
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2001 Apr; 47(4):44-51. PubMed ID: 11890088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Hanson D; Olson B; Hunter S; Henly SJ
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7):337-43. PubMed ID: 10326350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability of a handheld wound measurement and documentation device in clinical practice.
    Hammond CE; Nixon MA
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2011; 38(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 21483270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study.
    Carter TI; Pansy B; Wolff AL; Hillstrom HJ; Backus SI; Lenhoff M; Wolfe SW
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 34(8):1422-8. PubMed ID: 19703734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3-D measurement of posture and back shape using a low cost, portable system--a reliability study.
    Warren JG; Bettany-Saltikov J; Van Schaik P; Papastefanou SL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():100-4. PubMed ID: 15456011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standardization of wound photography using the Wound Electronic Medical Record.
    Rennert R; Golinko M; Kaplan D; Flattau A; Brem H
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Jan; 22(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 19096283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interrater and intrarater reliability of silhouette wound imaging device.
    Miller C; Karimi L; Donohue L; Kapp S
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2012 Nov; 25(11):513-8. PubMed ID: 23080239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproducibility of instrumented knee joint laxity measurement in healthy subjects.
    van der Esch M; Steultjens M; Ostelo RW; Harlaar J; Dekker J
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 May; 45(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 16332948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
    Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of smartphone attached mobile thermography assessing subclinical inflammation: a pilot study.
    Kanazawa T; Nakagami G; Goto T; Noguchi H; Oe M; Miyagaki T; Hayashi A; Sasaki S; Sanada H
    J Wound Care; 2016 Apr; 25(4):177-80, 182. PubMed ID: 27064366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
    Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Point-of-care wound visioning technology: Reproducibility and accuracy of a wound measurement app.
    Wang SC; Anderson JAE; Evans R; Woo K; Beland B; Sasseville D; Moreau L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183139. PubMed ID: 28817649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system.
    Bowling FL; King L; Fadavi H; Paterson JA; Preece K; Daniel RW; Matthews DJ; Boulton AJ
    Diabet Med; 2009 Jan; 26(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19125768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator: a triangulation approach.
    Bergquist-Beringer S; Gajewski B; Dunton N; Klaus S
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2011; 26(4):292-301. PubMed ID: 21407089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability, validity, and clinical usability of a digital goniometer.
    Carey MA; Laird DE; Murray KA; Stevenson JR
    Work; 2010; 36(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 20555176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel device for improving marker placement accuracy.
    Telfer S; Morlan G; Hyslop E; Semple R; Rafferty D; Woodburn J
    Gait Posture; 2010 Oct; 32(4):536-9. PubMed ID: 20719514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.