These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21945482)

  • 1. Effects of ocular transverse chromatic aberration on peripheral word identification.
    Yang SN; Tai YC; Laukkanen H; Sheedy JE
    Vision Res; 2011 Nov; 51(21-22):2273-81. PubMed ID: 21945482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of ocular transverse chromatic aberration on near foveal letter recognition.
    Yang SN; Tai YC; Laukkanen H; Sheedy J
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(23):2881-90. PubMed ID: 19761785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Embedded words in visual word recognition: does the left hemisphere see the rain in brain?
    McCormick SF; Davis CJ; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1256-66. PubMed ID: 20804295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: a review of the evidence.
    Ellis AW; Brysbaert M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19720073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Mar; 46(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19576580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parafoveal processing in word recognition.
    Kennedy A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):429-55. PubMed ID: 10881613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
    Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Foveal crowding in posterior cortical atrophy: a specific early-visual-processing deficit affecting word reading.
    Crutch SJ; Warrington EK
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 Dec; 24(8):843-66. PubMed ID: 18161498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Word processing in the parafoveal region.
    Lee CH; Kim K
    Int J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 22029615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A magnetic stimulation examination of orthographic neighborhood effects in visual word recognition.
    Lavidor M; Walsh V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):354-63. PubMed ID: 12729488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of ocular transverse chromatic aberration on detection acuity for peripheral vision.
    Cheney F; Thibos L; Bradley A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Jan; 35(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 25399925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The optimal use of non-optimal letter information in foveal and parafoveal word recognition.
    Bernard JB; Castet E
    Vision Res; 2019 Feb; 155():44-61. PubMed ID: 30629974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a viewing strategy during adaptation to an artificial central scotoma.
    Varsori M; Perez-Fornos A; Safran AB; Whatham AR
    Vision Res; 2004 Oct; 44(23):2691-705. PubMed ID: 15358064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Serial and parallel processing in reading: investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition.
    Dare N; Shillcock R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):487-504. PubMed ID: 22950804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J
    Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15581917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.