114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21945554)
1. Changing trend in the patterns of pretreatment diagnostic assessment for patients with cervical cancer in Japan.
Tomita N; Toita T; Kodaira T; Shinoda A; Uno T; Numasaki H; Teshima T; Mitsumori M
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 123(3):577-80. PubMed ID: 21945554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patterns of pretreatment diagnostic assessment and staging for patients with cervical cancer (1999-2001): patterns of care study in Japan.
Toita T; Kodaira T; Uno T; Shinoda A; Akino Y; Mitsumori M; Teshima T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 38(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 18202031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utilization of diagnostic studies in the pretreatment evaluation of invasive cervical cancer in the United States: results of intergroup protocol ACRIN 6651/GOG 183.
Amendola MA; Hricak H; Mitchell DG; Snyder B; Chi DS; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Gatsonis C
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 23(30):7454-9. PubMed ID: 16234512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of cystoscopy and intravenous urography after magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma.
Chung H; Ahn HS; Kim YS; Lee EJ; Ryu HS; Chang KH; Kim SJ
Yonsei Med J; 2001 Oct; 42(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 11675681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing disease extent in women with bulky or clinically evident metastatic cervical cancer: yield of pretreatment studies.
Massad LS; Calvello C; Gilkey SH; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Mar; 76(3):383-7. PubMed ID: 10684715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI and PET/CT for triaging stage IB clinically operable cervical cancer to appropriate therapy: decision analysis to assess patient outcomes.
Pandharipande PV; Choy G; del Carmen MG; Gazelle GS; Russell AH; Lee SI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):802-14. PubMed ID: 19234280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of hematogenous bone metastasis in cervical cancer: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography versus computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Liu FY; Yen TC; Chen MY; Lai CH; Chang TC; Chou HH; Hong JH; Chen YR; Ng KK
Cancer; 2009 Dec; 115(23):5470-80. PubMed ID: 19739235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer.
Wagenaar HC; Trimbos JB; Postema S; Anastasopoulou A; van der Geest RJ; Reiber JH; Kenter GG; Peters AA; Pattynama PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 11520143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical cancer staging, pretreatment planning, and surgical treatment in the Nordic countries-Survey from the Surgical Subcommittee of the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology.
Fuglsang K; Haldorsen IS; Avall-Lundqvist E; Lindahl G; Roed H; Woie K; Pakarinen P; Thoroddsen A; Anttila M; Blaakaer J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Oct; 97(10):1178-1184. PubMed ID: 29799176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer?
Marnitz S; Köhler C; Roth C; Füller J; Hinkelbein W; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 16126259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pretreatment planning of invasive cancer of the cervix.
Siegel CL; Andreotti RF; Cardenes HR; Brown DL; Gaffney DK; Horowitz NS; Javitt MC; Lee SI; Mitchell DG; Moore DH; Rao GG; Royal HD; Small W; Varia MA; Yashar CM;
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jun; 9(6):395-402. PubMed ID: 22632665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can MRI rule out bladder and rectal invasion in cervical cancer to help select patients for limited EUA?
Rockall AG; Ghosh S; Alexander-Sefre F; Babar S; Younis MT; Naz S; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 16310245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Pretreatment diagnostic evaluation of cervical cancer].
Lemke U; Hamm B
Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 19373746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patterns of radiotherapy practice for patients with cervical cancer in Japan, 2003-2005: changing trends in the pattern of care process.
Tomita N; Toita T; Kodaira T; Shinoda A; Uno T; Numasaki H; Teshima T; Mitsumori M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):1506-13. PubMed ID: 22270160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix--3 years' experience].
Bosković V; Glisić A; Petković S
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(5-6):183-7. PubMed ID: 9863378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The usefulness of cystoscopy in the staging of cervical cancer.
Liang CC; Tseng CJ; Soong YK
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Feb; 76(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 10637070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recurrency of head and neck cancer].
Pöpperl G; Lang S; Dagdelen O; Jäger L; Tiling R; Hahn K; Tatsch K
Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 12063600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in uterine cervical cancer.
Mezrich R
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 7489286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
