These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21946048)

  • 1. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.
    Zuidgeest M; Hendriks M; Koopman L; Spreeuwenberg P; Rademakers J
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):e68. PubMed ID: 21946048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of response mode on study results: offering cigarette smokers a choice of postal or online completion of a survey.
    Callas PW; Solomon LJ; Hughes JR; Livingston AE
    J Med Internet Res; 2010 Oct; 12(4):e46. PubMed ID: 20965873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial.
    Ernst SA; Brand T; Lhachimi SK; Zeeb H
    Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 53(2):879-895. PubMed ID: 28217941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-reported data in environmental health studies: mail vs. web-based surveys.
    Cantuaria ML; Blanes-Vidal V
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):238. PubMed ID: 31830906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians.
    McMahon SR; Iwamoto M; Massoudi MS; Yusuf HR; Stevenson JM; David F; Chu SY; Pickering LK
    Pediatrics; 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):e299-303. PubMed ID: 12671142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences. A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys.
    Harris LE; Weinberger M; Tierney WM
    Med Care; 1997 Jan; 35(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 8998204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of data quality and practicality of online versus postal questionnaires in a sample of testicular cancer survivors.
    Smith AB; King M; Butow P; Olver I
    Psychooncology; 2013 Jan; 22(1):233-7. PubMed ID: 21954102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-rated health assessed by web versus mail modes in a mixed mode survey: the digital divide effect and the genuine survey mode effect.
    Shim JM; Shin E; Johnson TP
    Med Care; 2013 Sep; 51(9):774-81. PubMed ID: 23774510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches.
    Sinclair M; O'Toole J; Malawaraarachchi M; Leder K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():132. PubMed ID: 22938205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
    Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Danish health and morbidity surveys: study design and participant characteristics.
    Jensen HAR; Ekholm O; Davidsen M; Christensen AI
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):91. PubMed ID: 31053088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial.
    Starr K; McPherson G; Forrest M; Cotton SC
    Trials; 2015 Jul; 16():295. PubMed ID: 26152519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Web and Mail Protocols for Administering Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Surveys.
    Fowler FJ; Brenner PS; Hargraves JL; Cleary PD
    Med Care; 2021 Oct; 59(10):907-912. PubMed ID: 34334736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response is increased using postal rather than electronic questionnaires - new results from an updated Cochrane Systematic Review.
    Edwards P; Perkins C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Sep; 24(1):209. PubMed ID: 39285263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors.
    Scott A; Jeon SH; Joyce CM; Humphreys JS; Kalb G; Witt J; Leahy A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Sep; 11():126. PubMed ID: 21888678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PROM Validation Using Paper-Based or Online Surveys: Data Collection Methods Affect the Sociodemographic and Health Profile of the Sample.
    Rowen D; Carlton J; Elliott J
    Value Health; 2019 Aug; 22(8):845-850. PubMed ID: 31426923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of administration mode on CAHPS survey response rates and results: A comparison of mail and web-based approaches.
    Fowler FJ; Cosenza C; Cripps LA; Edgman-Levitan S; Cleary PD
    Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 54(3):714-721. PubMed ID: 30656646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rates, Delays, and Completeness of General Practitioners' Responses to a Postal Versus Web-Based Survey: A Randomized Trial.
    Sebo P; Maisonneuve H; Cerutti B; Fournier JP; Senn N; Haller DM
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Mar; 19(3):e83. PubMed ID: 28330830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands.
    Dokkum NF; Koekenbier RH; van den Broek IV; van Bergen JE; Brouwers EE; Fennema JS; Götz HM; Hoebe CJ; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; Op de Coul EL
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Mar; 12():176. PubMed ID: 22404911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of Online or Paper Surveys by Australian Women: Longitudinal Study of Users, Devices, and Cohort Retention.
    Fitzgerald D; Hockey R; Jones M; Mishra G; Waller M; Dobson A
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e10672. PubMed ID: 30869647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.