These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21946485)

  • 1. Geometric design method for occlusal outlines of complex class I and class II inlay cavities.
    Kikuchi M; Takahashi M; Takada Y
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 21946485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Geometric design method for class I inlay cavity.
    Kikuchi M
    Dent Mater J; 2010 Nov; 29(6):637-41. PubMed ID: 21099166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis.
    Yamanel K; Caglar A; Gülsahi K; Ozden UA
    Dent Mater J; 2009 Nov; 28(6):661-70. PubMed ID: 20019416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD; Das UK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The inlay computer aided design based on reverse engineering technology].
    Liu ML; Lü PJ; Wang Y; Han JY; Zhao JJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 40(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 15774158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Cal E; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ceramic inlays: is the inlay thickness an important factor influencing the fracture risk?
    Holberg C; Rudzki-Janson I; Wichelhaus A; Winterhalder P
    J Dent; 2013 Jul; 41(7):628-35. PubMed ID: 23639702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations.
    Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cement Thickness of Inlay Restorations Made of Lithium Disilicate, Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic and Nano-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Evaluated Using 3D X-Ray Micro-Computed Tomography.
    Uzgur R; Ercan E; Uzgur Z; Çolak H; Yalçın M; Özcan M
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):456-460. PubMed ID: 27517616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays.
    Estafan D; Dussetschleger F; Agosta C; Reich S
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 15055635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of indirect inlays placed on different kinds of glass ionomer cement linings.
    Karaağaclioğlu L; Zaimoğlu A; Akören AC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Sep; 19(5):457-69. PubMed ID: 1453258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cerec classic: the inlay with Cerec 3D step-by-step.
    Schenk O
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jan; 6(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 12838590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of material selection on the risk of inlay fracture during pre-cementation functional occlusal tapping.
    Magne P; Paranhos MP; Schlichting LH
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 20934744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems.
    Romão W; Miranda WG; Cesar PF; Braga RR
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 15088734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Adaptation of the porcelain inlay, especially in Class II cavities (author's transl)].
    Katayama I; Amano Y; Tsuzimoto Y; Inoue S; Takei T; Kizima M; Koyama M; Okada K; Nakagawa S; Miyazaki N
    Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1978; 7(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 292462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of four tooth-coloured inlay systems in vivo.
    Van Meerbeek B; Inokoshi S; Willems G; Noack MJ; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Roulet JF; Vanherle G
    J Dent; 1992 Feb; 20(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 1548381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro evaluation of the marginal integrity of a porcelain inlay system.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cramer A; Wilson NH; Roulet JF; Noack M
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(6):517-23. PubMed ID: 1817522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.