These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21946545)

  • 1. Intraocular pressure: Goldmann tonometry, computational model, and calibration equation.
    Guzmán AF; Castilla AA; Guarnieri FA; Rodríguez FR
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Jan; 22(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 21946545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of cornea material stiffness on measured intraocular pressure.
    Kwon TH; Ghaboussi J; Pecknold DA; Hashash YM
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(8):1707-13. PubMed ID: 18455173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
    Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associations between diurnal changes in Goldmann tonometry, corneal geometry, and ocular response analyzer parameters.
    Lau W; Pye DC
    Cornea; 2012 Jun; 31(6):639-44. PubMed ID: 22382592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numerical study on human cornea and modified multiparametric correction equation for Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Khan MA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Feb; 30():91-102. PubMed ID: 24269944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applanation pressure function in Goldmann tonometry and its correction.
    Śródka W
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2013; 15(3):97-106. PubMed ID: 24215153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure.
    Broman AT; Congdon NG; Bandeen-Roche K; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 18091174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The relationship between central corneal thickness and Perkins applanation tonometry in rabbits].
    Luan CS; Chen XM; Deng YP; Wang L; Liu DJ; Cui M; Li J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 41(7):642-6. PubMed ID: 16080901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure differences between an air-puff tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Tranchina L; Lombardo M; Oddone F; Serrao S; Schiano Lomoriello D; Ducoli P
    J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(5):416-21. PubMed ID: 22366703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of central corneal thickness on measured intraocular pressure differentials: Nidek RKT-7700, Topcon CT-80 NCTs and Goldmann Tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Mucke S; Osuagwu UL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 23009324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of corneal tangent modulus in vivo.
    Ko MW; Leung LK; Lam DC; Leung CK
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Jun; 91(4):e263-9. PubMed ID: 23336962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiparameter correction equation for Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Elsheikh A; Alhasso D; Gunvant P; Garway-Heath D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jan; 88(1):E102-12. PubMed ID: 21037494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of three intraocular pressure measurement methods including biomechanical properties of the cornea.
    Smedowski A; Weglarz B; Tarnawska D; Kaarniranta K; Wylegala E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Feb; 55(2):666-73. PubMed ID: 24425850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
    Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.