These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21946545)

  • 21. The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry Measured Corneal Parameters and Intraocular Pressure, Corneal Thickness and Corneal Curvature.
    Asaoka R; Nakakura S; Tabuchi H; Murata H; Nakao Y; Ihara N; Rimayanti U; Aihara M; Kiuchi Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140385. PubMed ID: 26485129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
    Ko YC; Liu CJ; Hsu WM
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of corneal biomechanical properties in applanation tonometry measurements.
    Kwon TH; Ghaboussi J; Pecknold DA; Hashash Y
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 26(7):512-9. PubMed ID: 19715267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of corneal thickness changes during active uveitis on Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Heinz C; Taneri S; Roesel M; Heiligenhaus A
    Ophthalmic Res; 2012; 48(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 22354174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer as a self-tonometer.
    Naruse S; Mori K; Kinoshita S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 16101948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Finite element simulation of Goldmann tonometry after refractive surgery.
    Asejczyk-Widlicka M; Srodka W
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():24-28. PubMed ID: 31677547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Corneal modulus and IOP measurements in canine eyes using Goldmann applanation tonometry and Tono-pen.
    Tang J; Pan X; Weber PA; Liu J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Oct; 52(11):7866-71. PubMed ID: 21896862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [A new site-independent tonometer (ProTon) in comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Gräf M; Wassill H; Dick B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Apr; 206(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 7791286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty.
    Chou CY; Jordan CA; McGhee CN; Patel DV
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 153(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 22000702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
    Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Ku JY; Danesh-Meyer HV; Craig JP; Gamble GD; McGhee CN
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Feb; 20(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15803173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model.
    Neuburger M; Maier P; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; F Jordan J
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Sep; 22(7):584-90. PubMed ID: 22366704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determinants of postoperative corneal edema and impact on goldmann intraocular pressure.
    Huang Y; Zhang M; Huang C; Chen B; Lam DS; Zhang S; Congdon N
    Cornea; 2011 Sep; 30(9):962-7. PubMed ID: 21505325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in keratoconus.
    Unterlauft JD; Schädle N; Kasper K; Klink T; Geerling G
    Cornea; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1078-82. PubMed ID: 21716097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
    Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
    Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Salim S; Du H; Wan J
    J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of orthokeratology on intraocular pressure measurements.
    Chang CJ; Yang HH; Chang CA; Wu R; Tsai HY
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 28(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 23627528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.