These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21947132)

  • 1. Preceding movement effects on sequential aiming.
    Cheng DT; De Grosbois J; Smirl J; Heath M; Binsted G
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 215(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 21947132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomizing visual feedback in manual aiming: reminiscence of the previous trial condition and prior knowledge of feedback availability.
    Cheng DT; Luis M; Tremblay L
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 189(4):403-10. PubMed ID: 18560814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hitting a target is fundamentally different from avoiding obstacles.
    Aivar MP; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt B):166-78. PubMed ID: 25454701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reaction times for allocentric movements are 35 ms slower than reaction times for target-directed movements.
    Thaler L; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(2):313-28. PubMed ID: 21516448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constraints on the spatiotemporal accuracy of interceptive action: effects of target size on hitting a moving target.
    Tresilian JR; Plooy A; Carroll TJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(4):509-26. PubMed ID: 14999437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The integration of sequential aiming movements: Switching hand and direction at the first target.
    Lawrence GP; Khan MA; Mottram TM; Adam JJ; Buckolz E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():181-7. PubMed ID: 26829022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonvisual motor learning improves visual motion perception: evidence from violating the two-thirds power law.
    Beets IA; Rösler F; Fiehler K
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 104(3):1612-24. PubMed ID: 20610788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choosing the fastest movement: perceiving speed-accuracy tradeoffs.
    Young SJ; Pratt J; Chau T
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 185(4):681-8. PubMed ID: 17992521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human electrophysiological reflections of the recruitment of perceptual processing during actions that engage memory.
    Cruikshank LC; Caplan JB; Singhal A
    J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 22728678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dynamics of reciprocal aiming with a steering wheel.
    Davis NJ; Cui S; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 188(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 18438651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intercepting moving targets: does memory from practice in a specific condition of target displacement affect movement timing?
    de Azevedo Neto RM; Teixeira LA
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 May; 211(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 21533700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of online control: a developmental perspective.
    McKay SM; Weir PL
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2004; 25(3):299-320. PubMed ID: 15148001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Micro-movements of varying difficulties: wrist and arm movements.
    Boyle JB; Shea CH
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Aug; 229(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 23732949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic changes in the duration and precision of interception in response to variation of amplitude and effector size.
    Tresilian JR; Plooy A
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 171(4):421-35. PubMed ID: 16307234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time course of amplitude specification in brief interceptive actions.
    Marinovic W; Plooy A; Tresilian JR
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 188(2):275-88. PubMed ID: 18415092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-reference in action: Arm-movement responses are enhanced in perceptual matching.
    Desebrock C; Sui J; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():258-266. PubMed ID: 30153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A distance effect in a manual aiming task to remembered targets: a test of three hypotheses.
    Lemay M; Proteau L
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Oct; 140(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 11681311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Müller-Lyer illusion affects the planning and control of manual aiming movements.
    Meegan DV; Glazebrook CM; Dhillon VP; Tremblay L; Welsh TN; Elliott D
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 155(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 15064883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequential aiming with one and two limbs: effects of target size.
    Mottram TM; Khan MA; Lawrence GP; Adam JJ; Buckolz E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():83-8. PubMed ID: 24959974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acquisition of visuomanual skills and improvement of information processing capacities in 6- to 10-year-old children performing a 2D pointing task.
    Lambert J; Bard C
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Mar; 377(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15722176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.