These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21947132)

  • 21. Large-field visual motion directly induces an involuntary rapid manual following response.
    Saijo N; Murakami I; Nishida S; Gomi H
    J Neurosci; 2005 May; 25(20):4941-51. PubMed ID: 15901775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intercepting a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude.
    Tresilian JR; Lonergan A
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jan; 142(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 11807574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is saccade averaging determined by visual processing or movement planning?
    Bhutani N; Ray S; Murthy A
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Dec; 108(12):3161-71. PubMed ID: 23018999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes to online control and eye-hand coordination with healthy ageing.
    O'Rielly JL; Ma-Wyatt A
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Jun; 59():244-257. PubMed ID: 29747069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On-line vs. off-line utilization of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements.
    Bédard P; Proteau L
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 15029468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Ebbinghaus illusion affects on-line movement control.
    Handlovsky I; Hansen S; Lee TD; Elliott D
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Aug; 366(3):308-11. PubMed ID: 15288440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predictive strategies in interception tasks: differences between eye and hand movements.
    Eggert T; Rivas F; Straube A
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(4):433-49. PubMed ID: 15551090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of increasing memory load on the directional accuracy of pointing movements to remembered targets.
    Theleritis C; Smyrnis N; Mantas A; Evdokimidis I
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 157(4):518-25. PubMed ID: 15112116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The dual role of vision in sequential aiming movements.
    Khan MA; Sarteep S; Mottram TM; Lawrence GP; Adam JJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):425-31. PubMed ID: 21334583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual guidance of arm reaching: online adjustments of movement direction are impaired by amplitude control.
    Sarlegna FR; Blouin J
    J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):24. PubMed ID: 20616127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Controlling reaching movements with predictable and unpredictable target motion in 10-year-old children and adults.
    Daum MM; Huber S; Krist H
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 177(4):483-92. PubMed ID: 17006685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What activates the human mirror neuron system during observation of artificial movements: bottom-up visual features or top-down intentions?
    Engel A; Burke M; Fiehler K; Bien S; Rösler F
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2033-42. PubMed ID: 18339409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Observing repetitive finger movements modulates response times of auditorily cued finger movements.
    Biermann-Ruben K; Jonas M; Kessler K; Siebner HR; Bäumer T; Schnitzler A; Münchau A
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 18433965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The impact of task-constraints on the planning and control of interceptive hitting movements.
    Caljouw SR; van der Kamp J; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):84-9. PubMed ID: 16229948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When adaptive control fails: Slow recovery of reduced rapid online control during reaching under reversed vision.
    Kuang S; Gail A
    Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt B):155-65. PubMed ID: 25218421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How moving backgrounds influence interception.
    Brenner E; Smeets JB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119903. PubMed ID: 25767873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perseveration and contrast effects in grasping.
    Dixon P; Glover S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1578-84. PubMed ID: 19162049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The impact of real and illusory perturbations on the early trajectory adjustments of goal-directed movements.
    Grierson LE; Lyons J; Elliott D
    J Mot Behav; 2011; 43(5):383-91. PubMed ID: 21861628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Motor-induced visual motion: hand movements driving visual motion perception.
    Keetels M; Stekelenburg JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Sep; 232(9):2865-77. PubMed ID: 24820287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rapid online correction is selectively suppressed during movement with a visuomotor transformation.
    Gritsenko V; Kalaska JF
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 104(6):3084-104. PubMed ID: 20844106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.