These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21947592)

  • 1. MRI staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: does tumor biology affect accuracy?
    McGuire KP; Toro-Burguete J; Dang H; Young J; Soran A; Zuley M; Bhargava R; Bonaventura M; Johnson R; Ahrendt G
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3149-54. PubMed ID: 21947592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on HER2/neu status in invasive breast cancer.
    Li P; Liu T; Wang Y; Shao S; Zhang W; Lv Y; Yi J; Wang Z
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2013 Feb; 13(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 23103368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pathologic response to short intensified taxane-free neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with highly proliferative operable breast cancer.
    Le Tourneau C; Dettwiler S; Beuzeboc P; Alran S; Laurence V; Pierga JY; Fréneaux P; Sigal-Zafrani B; Diéras V; Vincent-Salomon A
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jun; 35(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 21358298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of breast magnetic resonance imaging in predicting pathologic response in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    De Los Santos J; Bernreuter W; Keene K; Krontiras H; Carpenter J; Bland K; Cantor A; Forero A
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2011 Oct; 11(5):312-9. PubMed ID: 21831721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in predicting infiltrating residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy in stage II-III breast cancer.
    Guarneri V; Pecchi A; Piacentini F; Barbieri E; Dieci MV; Ficarra G; Tazzioli G; Frassoldati A; Battista R; Canossi B; Mauri C; D'Amico R; Conte P; Torricelli P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Aug; 18(8):2150-7. PubMed ID: 21301969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Residual Mammographic Microcalcifications and Enhancing Lesions on MRI After Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Correlation with Histopathologic Residual Tumor Size.
    Kim YS; Chang JM; Moon HG; Lee J; Shin SU; Moon WK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):1135-42. PubMed ID: 26628432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinicopathological analyses of triple negative breast cancer using surveillance data from the Registration Committee of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society.
    Iwase H; Kurebayashi J; Tsuda H; Ohta T; Kurosumi M; Miyamoto K; Yamamoto Y; Iwase T
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Apr; 17(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 19466512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of clinical examination, digital mammogram, ultrasound, and MRI in determining postneoadjuvant pathologic tumor response in operable breast cancer patients.
    Croshaw R; Shapiro-Wright H; Svensson E; Erb K; Julian T
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3160-3. PubMed ID: 21947594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of MRI for treatment response assessment after taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer.
    Charehbili A; Wasser MN; Smit VT; Putter H; van Leeuwen-Stok AE; Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg WM; Liefers GJ; van de Velde CJ; Nortier JW; Kroep JR
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1216-21. PubMed ID: 25150151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are correlated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.
    Ono M; Tsuda H; Shimizu C; Yamamoto S; Shibata T; Yamamoto H; Hirata T; Yonemori K; Ando M; Tamura K; Katsumata N; Kinoshita T; Takiguchi Y; Tanzawa H; Fujiwara Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 132(3):793-805. PubMed ID: 21562709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer according to hormonal receptor status.
    Tanioka M; Sasaki M; Shimomura A; Fujishima M; Doi M; Matsuura K; Sakuma T; Yoshimura K; Saeki T; Ohara M; Tsurutani J; Watatani M; Takano T; Kawabata H; Mukai H; Naito Y; Hirokaga K; Takao S; Minami H
    Breast; 2014 Aug; 23(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 24742606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
    Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
    Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. TP53 genomics predict higher clinical and pathologic tumor response in operable early-stage breast cancer treated with docetaxel-capecitabine ± trastuzumab.
    Glück S; Ross JS; Royce M; McKenna EF; Perou CM; Avisar E; Wu L
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 132(3):781-91. PubMed ID: 21373875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FOXA1 Expression Significantly Predict Response to Chemotherapy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients.
    Xu C; Wei Q; Guo J; Zhou JC; Mei J; Jiang ZN; Shen JG; Wang LB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015; 22(6):2034-9. PubMed ID: 25707489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics.
    Lips EH; Mulder L; de Ronde JJ; Mandjes IA; Vincent A; Vrancken Peeters MT; Nederlof PM; Wesseling J; Rodenhuis S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 131(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 21472434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of factors that influence the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for predicting response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.
    Ko ES; Han BK; Kim RB; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hahn SY; Nam SJ; Lee JE; Lee SK; Im YH; Park YH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2562-8. PubMed ID: 23463090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.
    Carey LA; Dees EC; Sawyer L; Gatti L; Moore DT; Collichio F; Ollila DW; Sartor CI; Graham ML; Perou CM
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Apr; 13(8):2329-34. PubMed ID: 17438091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in Turkish patients.
    Duman BB; Afşar ÇU; Günaldi M; Sahin B; Kara IO; Erkisi M; Erçolak V
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(8):4119-23. PubMed ID: 23098527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship of clinical and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome of locally advanced breast cancer.
    Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Estabrook A; Gistrak MA; Jaffer S; Bleiweiss IJ
    J Surg Oncol; 2002 May; 80(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 11967899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prognostic model based on combining estrogen receptor expression and Ki-67 value after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts clinical outcome in locally advanced breast cancer: extension and analysis of a previously reported cohort of patients.
    Miglietta L; Morabito F; Provinciali N; Canobbio L; Meszaros P; Naso C; Murialdo R; Boitano M; Salvi S; Ferrarini M
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1046-52. PubMed ID: 23890870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 58.