These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21948040)

  • 41. High wear rates and extensive osteolysis in 3 types of uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a review of the PCA, the Harris Galante and the Profile/Tri-Lock Plus arthroplasties with a minimum of 12 years median follow-up in 96 hips.
    Hallan G; Lie SA; Havelin LI
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):575-84. PubMed ID: 16929433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Long-term results of the ABG-1 hydroxyapatite coated total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 111 cases with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
    Bidar R; Kouyoumdjian P; Munini E; Asencio G
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Dec; 95(8):579-87. PubMed ID: 19926546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Mid-term results of cementless ultima cups in primary total hip replacement].
    Hrubina M; Behounek J; Skoták M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Jun; 75(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 18601819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Digital Planning Software Fails to Reflect Stem Torsion on Plain Radiographs after Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Worlicek M; Weber M; Zeman F; Wörner M; Schneider M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T; Craiovan B
    Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 27355814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Primary total hip arthroplasty with Duraloc cup in patients younger than 50 years: a 5- to 7-year follow-up study.
    Jialiang T; Zhongyou M; Fuxing P; Zongke Z; Bin S; Jing Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Dec; 24(8):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19195836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Prediction of Charnley femoral stem aseptic loosening by early post-operative radiological features.
    Malik MH; Fisher N; Gray J; Wroblewski BM; Kay PR
    Int Orthop; 2005 Oct; 29(5):268-71. PubMed ID: 16082542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Long-term results with the cementless Alloclassic brand hip arthroplasty system.
    Pieringer H; Auersperg V; Griessler W; Böhler N
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 12728424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessment of accuracy and reliability in preoperative templating for hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Olsen M; Gamble P; Chiu M; Tumia N; Boyle RA; Schemitsch EH
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):445-9. PubMed ID: 19251390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Complications of hip arthroplasty causing periprosthetic radiolucency on plain radiographs.
    Tigges S; Stiles RG; Roberson JR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1387-91. PubMed ID: 8192005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Ten-year survival of the MS-30 matt-surfaced cemented stem.
    Berli BJ; Schäfer D; Morscher EW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Jul; 87(7):928-33. PubMed ID: 15972904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. How to read a postoperative total hip replacement radiograph.
    McBride TJ; Prakash D
    Postgrad Med J; 2011 Feb; 87(1024):101-9. PubMed ID: 21059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Role of Highly Selective Implant Retention in the Infected Hip Arthroplasty.
    El-Husseiny M; Haddad FS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2157-63. PubMed ID: 27334323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Radiographic assessment of uncemented total hip arthroplasty: reliability of the Engh Grading Scale.
    Muir SW; Al-Ahaideb A; Huckell J; Johnson MA; Johnston DB; Beaupre LA
    Can J Surg; 2011 Jun; 54(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 21609518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Are digital images good enough? A comparative study of conventional film-screen vs digital radiographs on printed images of total hip replacement.
    Eklund K; Jonsson K; Lindblom G; Lundin B; Sanfridsson J; Sloth M; Sivberg B
    Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):865-9. PubMed ID: 14618365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery.
    Gozzard C; Blom A; Taylor A; Smith E; Learmonth I
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Aug; 18(5):638-42. PubMed ID: 12934218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of radiolucency condition in total hip arthroplasty: a statistical comparison of the diagnostic capability of digitised image vs. conventional X-ray film.
    Testoni M; Baruffaldi F; Mattioli P; Sudanese A; Terzi S; Barbanti-Brodano G; Toni A
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(4):601-8. PubMed ID: 10795542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Radiographic assessment of cup migration in bipolar hip arthroplasty: intra-observer and interobserver errors and tolerance limits.
    Middha VP; Singhal K
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1992; 111(4):230-1. PubMed ID: 1622715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Geometry of the clavicle and reliability of measurement using PACS.
    Wisanuyotin T; Tidchom C; Chaisiwamonkhol K; Chowchuen P; Paholpak P; Sirichativapee W; Kosuwan W; Jeeravipoolvarn P
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2014 Aug; 36(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 24166071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparison of digital and manual templating using PACS images.
    Berstock JR; Webb JC; Spencer RF
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2010 Jan; 92(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 20056068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Radiographic grading of femoral stem cementation in hip arthroplasty.
    Garcia FL; Sugo AT; Picado CH
    Acta Ortop Bras; 2013 Jan; 21(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 24453640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.