These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21948864)

  • 21. Book review: the female fear.
    Homann J
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1991 Jul; 30(4):696. PubMed ID: 1890112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How to ... review an article.
    Basford P
    Nurs Times; 1990 Oct 3-9; 86(40):61. PubMed ID: 2216871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The joy of reviewing: a short guide to writing book and media reviews.
    Ventres W; Morrow C
    Fam Med; 2009; 41(7):492-3. PubMed ID: 19582634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What's in a review.
    Moore FD
    N Engl J Med; 1981 Apr; 304(14):840-1. PubMed ID: 7207514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Do we really still want books?].
    Hem E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Jul; 130(13):1323. PubMed ID: 20596093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Current status of biomedical book reviewing: Part V. Most frequently reviewed biomedical books in 1970.
    Chen CC
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1974 Jul; 62(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 4466509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How to read a book - or, the art of reviewing.
    Toase M
    Midwives Chron; 1983 Oct; 96(1149):361-2. PubMed ID: 6557355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Editing a scientific journal: problems and challenges.
    Zanchetti A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18090530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A loss of literacy? A century of changing substance and style in medical book reviewing.
    Weisse AB
    Hosp Pract (1995); 2001 Aug; 36(8):9-10, 13. PubMed ID: 11515779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reviewing medical books: a quarter century of observations.
    Burgdorf WH
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Nov; 59(5):e1-3. PubMed ID: 19119092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Thoughts about medical writing. XI. On reviewing bad books.
    Roland CG
    Anesth Analg; 1972; 51(3):462-3. PubMed ID: 5064027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Book reviewers and book reviews: potential conflict of interest.
    Burd A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Apr; 62(4):446. PubMed ID: 19324324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. And now the book reviews.
    Br J Psychiatry; 2000 Nov; 177():388-9. PubMed ID: 11059988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A note on book reviews.
    Anderson JR
    Histopathology; 1989 Feb; 14(2):227-8. PubMed ID: 2707759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Are book reviews in medical journals worthy?
    Ackerman AB
    Am J Dermatopathol; 1986 Dec; 8(6):461. PubMed ID: 3812919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An index to medical book reviews: a computer experiment.
    Atwood R
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1967 Jan; 55(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 6016372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Writing a book review.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2010 Sep; 51(9):685-8. PubMed ID: 20938606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Book reviews in Index Medicus.
    Pitchenik A; Breaux C; Goetting D
    N Engl J Med; 1978 Jun; 298(23):1319. PubMed ID: 651990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mycological Research: instructions and guidelines for authors.
    Hawksworth DL
    Mycol Res; 2007 Jan; 111(Pt 1):117-26. PubMed ID: 17280824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The evaluation of biomedical book reviews by academic health sciences librarians.
    Martin LM
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1986 Apr; 74(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 3708199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.