These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21950038)

  • 21. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acceptability of visual analogue scales in the clinical setting: a comparison with verbal rating scales in postoperative pain.
    Baños JE; Bosch F; Cañellas M; Bassols A; Ortega F; Bigorra J
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1989 Feb; 11(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 2709918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. SDAI/CDAI levels in rheumatoid arthritis patients are highly dependent on patient's pain perception and gender.
    Rintelen B; Haindl PM; Maktari A; Nothnagl T; Hartl E; Leeb BF
    Scand J Rheumatol; 2008; 37(6):410-3. PubMed ID: 18759162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Issues in combining the categorical and visual analog scale for the assessment of perceived thermal sensation: methodological and conceptual considerations.
    Lee JY; Stone EA; Wakabayashi H; Tochihara Y
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Mar; 41(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 19695560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Clinical observation on the relation between the confident degree of the patient with pain in acupuncture and moxibustion with the therapeutic effect].
    Xu PC; Li DL
    Zhongguo Zhen Jiu; 2006 May; 26(5):355-6. PubMed ID: 16739853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Measurement of clinical pain intensity: quantitative sensory testing].
    Murakawa K; Moriyama K; Yanamoto F; Nakano S; Fukunaga T; Arimura Y
    Masui; 2006 Sep; 55(9):1080-6. PubMed ID: 16984005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The assessment and management of cancer pain].
    Fuse Y; Fujita N
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1992 Mar; 19(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 1543356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of nurse and patient: perceptions of postsurgical pain.
    Stephenson NL
    J Intraven Nurs; 1994; 17(5):235-9. PubMed ID: 7965368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Team assessment of pain in children].
    Jakobs H; Rister M
    Klin Padiatr; 1997; 209(6):384-8. PubMed ID: 9445925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Responsiveness of visual analogue and McGill pain scale measures.
    Scrimshaw SV; Maher C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Oct; 24(8):501-4. PubMed ID: 11677548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability and validity of the Faces Pain Scale with older adults.
    Kim EJ; Buschmann MT
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2006 May; 43(4):447-56. PubMed ID: 16510146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Self-rating of pain in nonulcer dyspepsia. A methodological study comparing a new fixed-point scale and the visual analogue scale.
    Nyrén O; Adami HO; Bates S; Bergström R; Gustavsson S; Lööf L; Sjödén PO
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 1987 Aug; 9(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 3655274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Controlled mechanical distension of the human oesophagus: sensory and biomechanical findings.
    Drewes AM; Pedersen J; Liu W; Arendt-Nielsen L; Gregersen H
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2003 Jan; 38(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 12608461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bladder sensitivity testing using a visual analogue scale: comparative cystometric study on women.
    Dompeyre P; Fritel X; Bader G; Delmas V; Fauconnier A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(3):350-5. PubMed ID: 17245770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of perception threshold and pain in patients with Parkinson's disease using PainVision
    Kurihara K; Fujioka S; Mishima T; Tsuboi Y
    Front Neurol; 2023; 14():1130986. PubMed ID: 37213902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Learning from pain scales: patient perspective.
    Clark P; Lavielle P; Martínez H
    J Rheumatol; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1584-8. PubMed ID: 12858463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Colorado Behavioral Numerical Pain Scale in assessing medication-free colonoscopy patients' pain.
    Ylinen ER; Vehviläinen-Julkunen K; Pietilä AM
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2011; 34(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 21455046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pain assessment in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities; a pilot study into the use of the Pain Behaviour Checklist in everyday practice.
    van der Putten A; Vlaskamp C
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(5):1677-84. PubMed ID: 21440413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Correlations Between Electrically Quantified Pain Degree, Subjectively Assessed Visual Analogue Scale, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire: A Pilot Study.
    Kim J; Lee KS; Kong SW; Kim T; Kim MJ; Park SB; Lee KH
    Ann Rehabil Med; 2014 Oct; 38(5):665-72. PubMed ID: 25379496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Change in patients' satisfaction with pain control after using the Korean cancer pain assessment tool in Korea.
    Choi YS; Kim SH; Kim JS; Lee J; Kang JH; Kim SY; Kim SY; Kim CS; Song HS; Lim HY; Yim CY; Chung IJ; Cho GJ; Lee MA; Park J; Yeom CH
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2006 Jun; 31(6):553-62. PubMed ID: 16793495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.