These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21951447)

  • 1. Parents know best: or do they? Treatment refusals in paediatric oncology.
    Alessandri AJ
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2011 Sep; 47(9):628-31. PubMed ID: 21951447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revisiting the best interest standard: uses and misuses.
    Diekema DS
    J Clin Ethics; 2011; 22(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 21837884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using bioethics discourse to determine when parents should make health care decisions for their children: is deference justified?
    Rosato JL
    Temple Law Rev; 2000; 73(1):1-68. PubMed ID: 12449931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The best interest standard: both guide and limit to medical decision making on behalf of incapacitated patients.
    Pope TM
    J Clin Ethics; 2011; 22(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 21837885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Paradoxes in the judicial institution concerning decision-making in pediatric oncology].
    Sirvent N
    Arch Pediatr; 2010 Feb; 17 Suppl 1():S16-25. PubMed ID: 20172452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making medical decisions for a seriously sick child: some ethical dilemmas.
    Caldwell J
    Bull Med Ethics; 2000 Sep; (161):13-6. PubMed ID: 14733206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethics at the end of life: who should make decisions about treatment limitation for young children with life-threatening or life-limiting conditions?
    Gillam L; Sullivan J
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2011 Sep; 47(9):594-8. PubMed ID: 21951439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standards for family decisions: replacing best interests with harm prevention.
    Dresser R
    Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 12859819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An international feasibility study of parental decision making in pediatric oncology.
    Hinds PS; Oakes L; Quargnenti A; Furman W; Bowman L; Gilger E; Gattuso J; Martinson I; Yi KH; Drew D
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2000 Sep; 27(8):1233-43. PubMed ID: 11013904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Childhood malignancies and decision making.
    Holder AR
    Yale J Biol Med; 1992; 65(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 1519381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of the courts in clinical decision making.
    Leask K
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Dec; 90(12):1256-8. PubMed ID: 16174637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What limits, if any, should be placed on a parent's right to consent and/or refuse to consent to medical treatment for their child?
    Birchley G
    Nurs Philos; 2010 Oct; 11(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 20840139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When parents refuse treatment for their child.
    Kon AA
    JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 2006; 8(1):5-9, quiz 10-1. PubMed ID: 16543800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kara Neumann, spiritual healing, and the law.
    Leiker M
    WMJ; 2009 Nov; 108(8):415-6. PubMed ID: 20041581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
    Schor EL;
    Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When a child's treatment decisions conflict with the parents'.
    Turkoski BB
    Home Healthc Nurse; 2005 Feb; 23(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 15706164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A quality of life quandary: a framework for navigating parental refusal of treatment for co-morbidities in infants with underlying medical conditions.
    Kunz SN; McAdams RM; Diekema DS; Opel DJ
    J Clin Ethics; 2015; 26(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 25794289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention.
    Diekema DS
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2004; 25(4):243-64. PubMed ID: 15637945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Male circumcision, religious preferences, and the question of harm.
    Sheldon M
    Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 12859823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Withdrawal of treatment for minors in a persistent vegetative state: parents should decide.
    Massie AM
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):173-218. PubMed ID: 12645558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.