These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21952465)

  • 1. Investigation into data fraud results in heart researcher's dismissal.
    Dyer O
    BMJ; 2011 Sep; 343():d6208. PubMed ID: 21952465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fraud in biomedical research--the role of journal editors.
    De Caterina R; Griffioen AW; Porreca F
    Life Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(21-22):755-6. PubMed ID: 21983417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The aftermath of scientific fraud.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2006 Mar; 124(5):873-5. PubMed ID: 16530031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fraud, not error, is why two thirds of biomedical papers are withdrawn.
    Roehr B
    BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6658. PubMed ID: 23033379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retraction notice.
    Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1351. PubMed ID: 19299814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can we trust your data?
    Moore S
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2011 Nov; 38(6):615. PubMed ID: 22037323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The science of retraction.
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retractions of the year.
    Nat Med; 2010 Dec; 16(12):1363. PubMed ID: 21135834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific misconduct. Online sleuths challenge Cell paper.
    Xin H
    Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1669. PubMed ID: 17170263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The pain drug fraud scandal: implications for clinicians, investigators, and journals.
    Lipman AG
    J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2009; 23(3):216-8. PubMed ID: 19670016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
    Tavare A
    BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d8212. PubMed ID: 22207043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correcting the scientific record.
    Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Jul; 4(7):381. PubMed ID: 18560424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foibles and peccadillos in the research environment.
    Elwood TW
    J Allied Health; 2012; 41(4):147. PubMed ID: 23224279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paper retracted as co-author admits forgery.
    Adam D
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6925):775. PubMed ID: 12594468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific community. Targets of misconduct probe launch a legal counterattack.
    Servick K
    Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6217):13. PubMed ID: 25554768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientific misconduct. Fraud charges cast doubt on claims of DNA damage from cell phone fields.
    Vogel G
    Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5893):1144-5. PubMed ID: 18755946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Fraudulent data in studies of postoperative pain].
    Raeder J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Aug; 129(16):1658-9. PubMed ID: 19721486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retracted paper rattles Korean science.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7238):561. PubMed ID: 19340046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.