These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21954237)

  • 41. Bridging the gap between evidence and policy for infectious diseases: How models can aid public health decision-making.
    Knight GM; Dharan NJ; Fox GJ; Stennis N; Zwerling A; Khurana R; Dowdy DW
    Int J Infect Dis; 2016 Jan; 42():17-23. PubMed ID: 26546234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Causal Modelling for Supporting Planning and Management of Mental Health Services and Systems: A Systematic Review.
    Almeda N; García-Alonso CR; Salinas-Pérez JA; Gutiérrez-Colosía MR; Salvador-Carulla L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30691052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Framework for Developing the Structure of Public Health Economic Models.
    Squires H; Chilcott J; Akehurst R; Burr J; Kelly MP
    Value Health; 2016; 19(5):588-601. PubMed ID: 27565276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using system dynamics modelling to assess the economic efficiency of innovations in the public sector - a systematic review.
    Jadeja N; Zhu NJ; Lebcir RM; Sassi F; Holmes A; Ahmad R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263299. PubMed ID: 35143541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A systematic literature review of the key challenges for developing the structure of public health economic models.
    Squires H; Chilcott J; Akehurst R; Burr J; Kelly MP
    Int J Public Health; 2016 Apr; 61(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 26747470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. What makes an academic paper useful for health policy?
    Whitty CJ
    BMC Med; 2015 Dec; 13():301. PubMed ID: 26675206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Do different decision-analytic modeling approaches produce different results? A systematic review of cross-validation studies.
    Tsoi B; Goeree R; Jegathisawaran J; Tarride JE; Blackhouse G; O'Reilly D
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015 Jun; 15(3):451-63. PubMed ID: 25728942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Modelling plant health for policy.
    Jones G; Kleczkowski A
    Emerg Top Life Sci; 2020 Dec; 4(5):473-483. PubMed ID: 33313752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Avoiding and identifying errors and other threats to the credibility of health economic models.
    Tappenden P; Chilcott JB
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Oct; 32(10):967-79. PubMed ID: 25027943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Subjective judgements - no more, no less? A response to Malterud, Bjelland and Elvbakken.
    Fretheim A
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Nov; 16(1):111. PubMed ID: 30458794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accounting for uncertainty in health economic decision models by using model averaging.
    Jackson CH; Thompson SG; Sharples LD
    J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc; 2009 Apr; 172(2):383-404. PubMed ID: 19381329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Economic analyses to inform public health decision-making for tuberculosis: the role of understanding implementation.
    Shete PB; Kahn JG
    BMC Med; 2019 Nov; 17(1):224. PubMed ID: 31783754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cost-effectiveness models for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: IPECAD modeling workshop cross-comparison challenge.
    Handels RLH; Green C; Gustavsson A; Herring WL; Winblad B; Wimo A; Sköldunger A; Karlsson A; Anderson R; Belger M; Brück C; Espinosa R; Hlávka JP; Jutkowitz E; Lin PJ; Mendez ML; Mar J; Shewmaker P; Spackman E; Tafazzoli A; Tysinger B; Jönsson L;
    Alzheimers Dement; 2023 May; 19(5):1800-1820. PubMed ID: 36284403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cost effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening and rescreening in men in a modern context: evaluation of a hypothetical cohort using a decision analytical model.
    Søgaard R; Laustsen J; Lindholt JS
    BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e4276. PubMed ID: 22767630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The credibility of health economic models for health policy decision-making: the case of population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Campbell H; Briggs A; Buxton M; Kim L; Thompson S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Jan; 12(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 17244392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Endovascular stents for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and economic model.
    Chambers D; Epstein D; Walker S; Fayter D; Paton F; Wright K; Michaels J; Thomas S; Sculpher M; Woolacott N
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Oct; 13(48):1-189, 215-318, iii. PubMed ID: 19849958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Presentation of economic evaluation results.
    Chaikledkaew U; Teerawattananon Y
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S66-73. PubMed ID: 19253489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evidence for the credibility of health economic models for health policy decision-making: a systematic literature review of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Søgaard R; Lindholt J
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2012 Jan; 17(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 21954237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.