182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21954630)
1. [Contemporary concepts of homology in biology (a theoretical review)].
Pavlinov IIa
Zh Obshch Biol; 2011; 72(4):298-319. PubMed ID: 21954630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
Pavlinov IIa
Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Phylogenetic thinking in the modern biology].
Pavlinov IIa
Zh Obshch Biol; 2007; 68(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 17338264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Concepts of rational taxonomy].
Pavlinov IIa
Zh Obshch Biol; 2011; 72(1):3-26. PubMed ID: 21469346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [It is normal for classification approaches to be diverse].
Pavlinov IIa
Zh Obshch Biol; 2003; 64(4):275-91. PubMed ID: 14524225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ["Phylogenetic presumptions"--can jurisprudence terms promote comparative biology?].
Pesenko IuA
Zh Obshch Biol; 2005; 66(2):146-63. PubMed ID: 15859451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 'Type' in morphology and phylogeny.
Rieppel O
J Morphol; 2006 May; 267(5):528-35. PubMed ID: 16485277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The problem of archetype and current biology].
Shatalkin AI
Zh Obshch Biol; 2002; 63(4):275-91. PubMed ID: 12298177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Classical and non-classical taxonomy: where does the boundary pass?].
Pavlinov IIa
Zh Obshch Biol; 2006; 67(2):83-106. PubMed ID: 16756105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Some notes on relation between taxon and character in taxonomy (regarding the paper of A.A. Stekol'nikov "A problem of truth...", Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii. 2003.V.64. No 4. P.367-368)].
Pavlinov IIa
Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 15125212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolutionary patterns in ontogenetic transformation: from laws to regularities.
Alberch P; Blanco MJ
Int J Dev Biol; 1996 Aug; 40(4):845-58. PubMed ID: 8877459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [On the significance of presumptions in phylogenetics (regarding the paper of Pesenko, 2005. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii. V. 66. No 2)].
Pavlinov IIa
Zh Obshch Biol; 2005; 66(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 16245574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modules, kinds, and homology.
Rieppel O
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2005 Jan; 304(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 15595718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep homology: a view from systematics.
Scotland RW
Bioessays; 2010 May; 32(5):438-49. PubMed ID: 20394064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A critique of homology as a morphological concept.
Cartmill M
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1994 May; 94(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 8042700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transformationalism, taxism, and developmental biology in systematics.
Bang R; DeSalle R; Wheeler W
Syst Biol; 2000 Mar; 49(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 12116480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Homology in comparative, molecular, and evolutionary developmental biology: the radiation of a concept.
Brigandt I
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2003 Oct; 299(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 14508812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does biology need an organism concept?
Pepper JW; Herron MD
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 Nov; 83(4):621-7. PubMed ID: 18947335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The formation of the theory of homology in biological sciences.
Kleisner K
Acta Biotheor; 2007; 55(4):317-40. PubMed ID: 17929173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
