BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21955102)

  • 1. Superiority of virtual microscopy versus light microscopy in transplantation pathology.
    Ozluk Y; Blanco PL; Mengel M; Solez K; Halloran PF; Sis B
    Clin Transplant; 2012; 26(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 21955102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of whole slide images as a diagnostic modality for renal allograft biopsies.
    Jen KY; Olson JL; Brodsky S; Zhou XJ; Nadasdy T; Laszik ZG
    Hum Pathol; 2013 May; 44(5):888-94. PubMed ID: 23199528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of the Banff classification in subclinical kidney transplant rejection.
    Veronese FV; Manfro RC; Roman FR; Edelweiss MI; Rush DN; Dancea S; Goldberg J; Gonçalves LF
    Clin Transplant; 2005 Aug; 19(4):518-21. PubMed ID: 16008598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A web-based pilot study of inter-pathologist reproducibility using the ISHLT 2004 working formulation for biopsy diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection: the European experience.
    Angelini A; Andersen CB; Bartoloni G; Black F; Bishop P; Doran H; Fedrigo M; Fries JW; Goddard M; Goebel H; Neil D; Leone O; Marzullo A; Ortmann M; Paraf F; Rotman S; Turhan N; Bruneval P; Frigo AC; Grigoletto F; Gasparetto A; Mencarelli R; Thiene G; Burke M
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2011 Nov; 30(11):1214-20. PubMed ID: 21816625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading.
    Helin H; Lundin M; Lundin J; Martikainen P; Tammela T; Helin H; van der Kwast T; Isola J
    Hum Pathol; 2005 Apr; 36(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 15891999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interobserver agreement for Polyomavirus nephropathy grading in renal allografts using the working proposal from the 10th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology.
    Sar A; Worawichawong S; Benediktsson H; Zhang J; Yilmaz S; Trpkov K
    Hum Pathol; 2011 Dec; 42(12):2018-24. PubMed ID: 21733554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital reporting of whole-slide images is safe and suitable for assessing organ quality in preimplantation renal biopsies.
    Eccher A; Neil D; Ciangherotti A; Cima L; Boschiero L; Martignoni G; Ghimenton C; Chilosi M; Giobelli L; Zampicinini L; Casartelli M; Brunelli M
    Hum Pathol; 2016 Jan; 47(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 26547252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the use of digital images for a national prostate core external quality assurance scheme.
    Harnden P; Coleman D; Moss S; Kodikara S; Griffin NR; Melia J
    Histopathology; 2011 Oct; 59(4):703-9. PubMed ID: 22014051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized comparison of virtual microscopy and traditional glass microscopy in diagnostic accuracy among dermatology and pathology residents.
    Koch LH; Lampros JN; Delong LK; Chen SC; Woosley JT; Hood AF
    Hum Pathol; 2009 May; 40(5):662-7. PubMed ID: 19144382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An array microscope for ultrarapid virtual slide processing and telepathology. Design, fabrication, and validation study.
    Weinstein RS; Descour MR; Liang C; Barker G; Scott KM; Richter L; Krupinski EA; Bhattacharyya AK; Davis JR; Graham AR; Rennels M; Russum WC; Goodall JF; Zhou P; Olszak AG; Williams BH; Wyant JC; Bartels PH
    Hum Pathol; 2004 Nov; 35(11):1303-14. PubMed ID: 15668886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evaluation of colon biopsies using virtual microscopy is reliable.
    van der Post RS; van der Laak JA; Sturm B; Clarijs R; Schaafsma HE; van Krieken JH; Nap M
    Histopathology; 2013 Jul; 63(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 23692065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histological scoring of fibrosis and activity in HIV-chronic hepatitis B related liver disease: performance of the METAVIR score assessed on virtual slides.
    Wendum D; Lacombe K; Chevallier M; Callard P; Valet F; Miailhes P; Bonnard P; Molina JM; Lascoux-Combe C; Fléjou JF; Girard PM
    J Clin Pathol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):361-3. PubMed ID: 19126564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. iPathology cockpit diagnostic station: validation according to College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center recommendation at the Hospital Trust and University of Verona.
    Brunelli M; Beccari S; Colombari R; Gobbo S; Giobelli L; Pellegrini A; Chilosi M; Lunardi M; Martignoni G; Scarpa A; Eccher A
    Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 25565219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides: implications for medical education and differences with experience.
    Krupinski EA; Tillack AA; Richter L; Henderson JT; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Graham AR; Descour MR; Davis JR; Weinstein RS
    Hum Pathol; 2006 Dec; 37(12):1543-56. PubMed ID: 17129792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utility of whole slide imaging and virtual microscopy in prostate pathology.
    Camparo P; Egevad L; Algaba F; Berney DM; Boccon-Gibod L; Compérat E; Evans AJ; Grobholz R; Kristiansen G; Langner C; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Oliveira P; Vainer B; Varma M
    APMIS; 2012 Apr; 120(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 22429212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing virtual with conventional microscopy for the consensus diagnosis of Barrett's neoplasia in the AspECT Barrett's chemoprevention trial pathology audit.
    Sanders DS; Grabsch H; Harrison R; Bateman A; Going J; Goldin R; Mapstone N; Novelli M; Walker MM; Jankowski J;
    Histopathology; 2012 Nov; 61(5):795-800. PubMed ID: 22716297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of cytology proficiency testing: glass slides vs. virtual slides.
    Gagnon M; Inhorn S; Hancock J; Keller B; Carpenter D; Merlin T; Hearn T; Thompson P; Whalen R
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 15581163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of virtual microscopy and glass slide microscopy among dermatology residents during a simulated in-training examination.
    Brick KE; Sluzevich JC; Cappel MA; DiCaudo DJ; Comfere NI; Wieland CN
    J Cutan Pathol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):807-11. PubMed ID: 23808673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of the Banff schema in reporting protocol biopsies of stable renal allografts.
    Gough J; Rush D; Jeffery J; Nickerson P; McKenna R; Solez K; Trpkov K
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2002 Jun; 17(6):1081-4. PubMed ID: 12032200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Virtual microscopy for learning and assessment in pathology.
    Kumar RK; Velan GM; Korell SO; Kandara M; Dee FR; Wakefield D
    J Pathol; 2004 Dec; 204(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 15470688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.