These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21955759)

  • 1. Rater-based assessments as social judgments: rethinking the etiology of rater errors.
    Gingerich A; Regehr G; Eva KW
    Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10 Suppl):S1-7. PubMed ID: 21955759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the role of first impressions in rater-based assessments.
    Wood TJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2014 Aug; 19(3):409-27. PubMed ID: 23529821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More consensus than idiosyncrasy: Categorizing social judgments to examine variability in Mini-CEX ratings.
    Gingerich A; van der Vleuten CP; Eva KW; Regehr G
    Acad Med; 2014 Nov; 89(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 25250753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method for identifying extreme OSCE examiners.
    Bartman I; Smee S; Roy M
    Clin Teach; 2013 Feb; 10(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 23294740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-rater variability as mutual disagreement: identifying raters' divergent points of view.
    Gingerich A; Ramlo SE; van der Vleuten CPM; Eva KW; Regehr G
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 22(4):819-838. PubMed ID: 27651046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Broadening perspectives on clinical performance assessment: rethinking the nature of in-training assessment.
    Govaerts MJ; van der Vleuten CP; Schuwirth LW; Muijtjens AM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2007 May; 12(2):239-60. PubMed ID: 17096207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of first impressions on subsequent ratings within an OSCE station.
    Wood TJ; Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S; Pugh D; Touchie C
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 22(4):969-983. PubMed ID: 27848171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the impact of mental workload on rater-based assessments.
    Tavares W; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 May; 18(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 22484964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors Influencing Mini-CEX Rater Judgments and Their Practical Implications: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Lee V; Brain K; Martin J
    Acad Med; 2017 Jun; 92(6):880-887. PubMed ID: 28030422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using frame-of-reference training to understand the implications of rater idiosyncrasy for rating accuracy.
    Uggerslev KL; Sulsky LM
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 May; 93(3):711-9. PubMed ID: 18457499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The meaning and suitability of various effect sizes for structured Rater x Ratee designs.
    Hönekopp J; Becker BJ; Oswald FL
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 16594768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are raters influenced by prior information about a learner? A review of assimilation and contrast effects in assessment.
    Humphrey-Murto S; Shaw T; Touchie C; Pugh D; Cowley L; Wood TJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2021 Aug; 26(3):1133-1156. PubMed ID: 33566199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and reliability of exposure assessors' ratings of exposure intensity by type of occupational questionnaire and type of rater.
    Friesen MC; Coble JB; Katki HA; Ji BT; Xue S; Lu W; Stewart PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):601-11. PubMed ID: 21511891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling Rating Order Effects Under Item Response Theory Models for Rater-Mediated Assessments.
    Huang HY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Jun; 47(4):312-327. PubMed ID: 37283589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining rating quality in writing assessment: rater agreement, error, and accuracy.
    Wind SA; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):321-35. PubMed ID: 23270978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emotions and assessment: considerations for rater-based judgements of entrustment.
    Gomez-Garibello C; Young M
    Med Educ; 2018 Mar; 52(3):254-262. PubMed ID: 29119582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in inter-rater reliability and accuracy for a treatment adherence scale.
    Wu SM; Whiteside U; Neighbors C
    Cogn Behav Ther; 2007; 36(4):230-9. PubMed ID: 18049948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students.
    Lurie SJ; Nofziger AC; Meldrum S; Mooney C; Epstein RM
    Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 40(11):1088-97. PubMed ID: 17054618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Source-monitoring training: toward reducing rater expectancy effects in behavioral measurement.
    Martell RF; Evans DP
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Sep; 90(5):956-63. PubMed ID: 16162067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Workplace-based assessment: raters' performance theories and constructs.
    Govaerts MJ; Van de Wiel MW; Schuwirth LW; Van der Vleuten CP; Muijtjens AM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Aug; 18(3):375-96. PubMed ID: 22592323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.