BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21955770)

  • 1. F-type testlets and the effects of feedback and case-specificity.
    Baldwin P; Baldwin SG; Haist SA
    Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10 Suppl):S55-8; quiz S58. PubMed ID: 21955770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of multimedia on the step 1 and step 2 clinical knowledge components of USMLE: a controlled trial of the impact on item characteristics.
    Holtzman KZ; Swanson DB; Ouyang W; Hussie K; Allbee K
    Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10 Suppl):S90-3. PubMed ID: 19907397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of repeat information on examinee performance for a large-scale standardized-patient examination.
    Swygert KA; Balog KP; Jobe A
    Acad Med; 2010 Sep; 85(9):1506-10. PubMed ID: 20736678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequence effects in the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 2 clinical skills (cs) examination.
    Ramineni C; Harik P; Margolis MJ; Clauser BE; Swanson DB; Dillon GF
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S101-4. PubMed ID: 17895671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing context effects on test validity of the National Board Dental Examination Part I.
    Yang CL; Neumann LM; Kramer GA
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 22473551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixed or random testlet effects: a comparison of two multilevel testlet models.
    Chen TA
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(3):231-47. PubMed ID: 23234827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between USMLE Step 2 CS patient note ratings and time spent on the note: do examinees who spend more time write better notes?
    Swygert KA; Muller ES; Scott CL; Swanson DB
    Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10 Suppl):S89-92. PubMed ID: 20881712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast effects in the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills examination.
    Ramineni C; Clauser BE; Harik P; Swanson DB
    Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S45-8. PubMed ID: 18820499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring the Utility of Logistic Mixed Modeling Approaches to Simultaneously Investigate Item and Testlet DIF on Testlet-based Data.
    Fukuhara H; Paek I
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 26784379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploratory Factor Analysis of a Computerized Case-Based F-Type Testlet Variant.
    Kıyak YS; Budakoğlu Iİ; Bakan Kalaycıoğlu D; Coşkun Ö
    Med Sci Educ; 2023 Oct; 33(5):1191-1196. PubMed ID: 37886300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Five-year summary of COMLEX-USA level 2-PE examinee performance and survey data.
    Langenau EE; Dyer C; Roberts WL; Wilson C; Gimpel J
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2010 Mar; 110(3):114-25. PubMed ID: 20386020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention of basic science information by senior medical students.
    Ling Y; Swanson DB; Holtzman K; Bucak SD
    Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S82-5. PubMed ID: 18820508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychometric characteristics and response times for content-parallel extended-matching and one-best-answer items in relation to number of options.
    Swanson DB; Holtzman KZ; Allbee K; Clauser BE
    Acad Med; 2006 Oct; 81(10 Suppl):S52-5. PubMed ID: 17001136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Multilevel analysis of the relationships between examinee gender and United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) step 2 CK content area performance.
    Cuddy MM; Swanson DB; Clauser BE
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S89-93. PubMed ID: 17895701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Repeated Exposure to Items.
    O'Neill TR; Sun L; Peabody MR; Royal KD
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 26507998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The second time around: accounting for retest effects on oral examinations.
    Raymond MR; Luciw-Dubas UA
    Eval Health Prof; 2010 Sep; 33(3):386-403. PubMed ID: 20801978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Extension of Testlet-Based Equating to the Polytomous Testlet Response Theory Model.
    Huang F; Li Z; Liu Y; Su J; Yin L; Zhang M
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():743362. PubMed ID: 35095641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multilevel analysis of examinee gender and USMLE step 1 performance.
    Cuddy MM; Swanson DB; Clauser BE
    Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S58-62. PubMed ID: 18820503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating construct equivalence and criterion-related validity for repeat examinees on a standardized patient examination.
    Raymond MR; Kahraman N; Swygert KA; Balog KP
    Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10):1253-9. PubMed ID: 21869669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. North American Veterinary Licensing Examination pacing study.
    Subhiyah RG; Boyce JR
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 21135405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.