330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21956026)
1. Deciphering information encoded in birdsong: male songbirds with fertile mates respond most strongly to complex, low-amplitude songs used in courtship.
Reichard DG; Rice RJ; Vanderbilt CC; Ketterson ED
Am Nat; 2011 Oct; 178(4):478-87. PubMed ID: 21956026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft song during aggressive interactions: seasonal changes and endocrine correlates in song sparrows.
Maddison CJ; Anderson RC; Prior NH; Taves MD; Soma KK
Horm Behav; 2012 Sep; 62(4):455-63. PubMed ID: 22902893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Acoustic communication and sexual selection in Orthoptera (Insecta)].
Vedenina VIu
Zh Obshch Biol; 2005; 66(4):336-45. PubMed ID: 16212283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responses of a sub-oscine bird during playback: effects of different song variants and breeding period.
Ríos-Chelén AA; Garcia CM
Behav Processes; 2007 Mar; 74(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 17207941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic characteristics, early experience, and endocrine status interact to modulate female zebra finches' behavioral responses to songs.
Vyas A; Harding C; Borg L; Bogdan D
Horm Behav; 2009 Jan; 55(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 18804474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulation of territorial behavior in the sedentary song sparrow, Melospiza melodia morphna.
Wingfield JC
Horm Behav; 1994 Mar; 28(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 8034278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phonological-dependent territorial responses in yellowhammers (Emberiza citrinella).
Giret N; Nitsch A; Nagle L
Behav Processes; 2011 Oct; 88(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 21827836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of septal lesions on male song and aggression in the colonial zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) and the territorial field sparrow (Spizella pusilla).
Goodson JL; Eibach R; Sakata J; Adkins-Regan E
Behav Brain Res; 1999 Jan; 98(1):167-80. PubMed ID: 10210532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robust behavioral effects of song playback in the absence of testosterone or corticosterone release.
Rosvall KA; Reichard DG; Ferguson SM; Whittaker DJ; Ketterson ED
Horm Behav; 2012 Sep; 62(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 22850247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sing softly to evoke a response only from a recent intruder.
Jakubowska A; Osiejuk TS
Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():244-249. PubMed ID: 30366107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The two parts of the blackcap song: Acoustic analysis and male responses to playbacks.
Linossier J; Courvoisier H; Aubin T
Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():87-92. PubMed ID: 26522931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Song perception among incipient species as a mechanism for reproductive isolation.
Brambilla M; Janni O; Guidali F; Sorace A
J Evol Biol; 2008 May; 21(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 18355185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
Gerhardt HC
Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of septal lesions on male song and aggression in the colonial zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) and the territorial field sparrow (Spizella pusilla).
Goodson JL; Eibach R; Sakata J; Adkins-Regan E
Behav Brain Res; 1999 May; 101(1):167-80. PubMed ID: 10342406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are bird song complexity and song sharing shaped by habitat structure? An information theory and statistical approach.
Briefer E; Osiejuk TS; Rybak F; Aubin T
J Theor Biol; 2010 Jan; 262(1):151-64. PubMed ID: 19782691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complementary neural systems for the experience-dependent integration of mate-choice cues in European starlings.
Sockman KW; Gentner TQ; Ball GF
J Neurobiol; 2005 Jan; 62(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 15389683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Year-round resource defence and the evolution of male and female song in suboscine birds: social armaments are mutual ornaments.
Tobias JA; Gamarra-Toledo V; García-Olaechea D; Pulgarín PC; Seddon N
J Evol Biol; 2011 Oct; 24(10):2118-38. PubMed ID: 21707816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Female canaries that respond and discriminate more between male songs of different quality have a larger song control nucleus (HVC) in the brain.
Leitner S; Catchpole CK
J Neurobiol; 2002 Sep; 52(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 12210096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Signalling through acoustic windows: Nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing.
Brumm H
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2006 Dec; 192(12):1279-85. PubMed ID: 16924503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mutations and natural genetic variation in the courtship song of Drosophila.
Gleason JM
Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 15864442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]