These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21957062)

  • 1. Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity.
    Windhager S; Schaefer K; Fink B
    Am J Hum Biol; 2011; 23(6):805-14. PubMed ID: 21957062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women.
    Fink B; Neave N; Seydel H
    Am J Hum Biol; 2007; 19(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 17160983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Associations among facial masculinity, physical strength, fluctuating asymmetry and attractiveness in young men and women.
    Van Dongen S
    Ann Hum Biol; 2014; 41(3):205-13. PubMed ID: 24555492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual dimorphism and personality attributions of male faces.
    Pivonkova V; Rubesova A; Lindova J; Havlicek J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1137-43. PubMed ID: 21901645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
    Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shape analysis of female facial attractiveness.
    Valenzano DR; Mennucci A; Tartarelli G; Cellerino A
    Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1282-91. PubMed ID: 16356527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex difference in attractiveness perceptions of strong and weak male walkers.
    Fink B; André S; Mines JS; Weege B; Shackelford TK; Butovskaya ML
    Am J Hum Biol; 2016 Nov; 28(6):913-917. PubMed ID: 27387424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance.
    Neave N; Laing S; Fink B; Manning JT
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Oct; 270(1529):2167-72. PubMed ID: 14561281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Perceived Height, Masculinity, and Age on Each Other and on Perceptions of Dominance in Male Faces.
    Batres C; Re DE; Perrett DI
    Perception; 2015; 44(11):1293-309. PubMed ID: 26562897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Women's preferences for masculinity in male faces are highest during reproductive age range and lower around puberty and post-menopause.
    Little AC; Saxton TK; Roberts SC; Jones BC; Debruine LM; Vukovic J; Perrett DI; Feinberg DR; Chenore T
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2010 Jul; 35(6):912-20. PubMed ID: 20060226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of type of facial stimuli.
    Rennels JL; Bronstad PM; Langlois JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):884-93. PubMed ID: 18665733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens).
    Penton-Voak IS; Little AC; Jones BC; Burt DM; Tiddeman BP; Perrett DI
    J Comp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 117(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 14498802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Men's facial masculinity: when (body) size matters.
    Holzleitner IJ; Hunter DW; Tiddeman BP; Seck A; Re DE; Perrett DI
    Perception; 2014; 43(11):1191-202. PubMed ID: 25638935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 2D:4D and sexually dimorphic facial characteristics.
    Burriss RP; Little AC; Nelson EC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Jun; 36(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 17203400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women.
    Baudouin JY; Tiberghien G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 Nov; 117(3):313-32. PubMed ID: 15500809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facial cues to physical strength are not always associated with facial masculinity: Comparative study of Europeans and Southern Siberians.
    Mezentseva AA; Rostovtseva VV; Butovskaya ML
    Am J Hum Biol; 2024 Jan; 36(1):e23974. PubMed ID: 37548991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physical strength and dance attractiveness: Further evidence for an association in men, but not in women.
    Weege B; Pham MN; Shackelford TK; Fink B
    Am J Hum Biol; 2015; 27(5):728-30. PubMed ID: 25754668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Unger L; Little AC; Feinberg DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1420-30. PubMed ID: 18085954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Male facial cues to physical strength in Europe: Medium-strength preference and higher aggressiveness attribution to the weakest.
    Schaefer K; Seiser VM; Prucha S; Kerschbaumer V; Fink B; Windhager S
    Am J Hum Biol; 2024 Jun; 36(6):e24040. PubMed ID: 38174630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.