These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2195741)

  • 1. Partially coherent transducers: the random phase transducer approach.
    Mallart R; Fink M; Laugier P; Abouelkaram S
    Ultrason Imaging; 1990 Jul; 12(3):205-28. PubMed ID: 2195741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The random phase transducer: a new technique for incoherent processing-experimental results.
    Laugier P; Fink M; Abouelkaram S
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1990; 37(2):70-8. PubMed ID: 18285017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The random phase transducer: a new technique for incoherent processing-basic principles and theory.
    Fink M; Mallart R; Cancre F
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1990; 37(2):54-69. PubMed ID: 18285016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Maltese cross processor: speckle reduction for circular transducers.
    Smith SW; von Ramm OT
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Jul; 10(3):153-70. PubMed ID: 3062870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speckle reduction in pulse echo imaging using phase insensitive and phase sensitive signal processing techniques.
    Kerr AT; Patterson MS; Foster FS; Hunt JW
    Ultrason Imaging; 1986 Jan; 8(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 3521043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diffraction correction methods for insertion ultrasound attenuation estimation.
    Xu W; Kaufman JJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jun; 40(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 8262538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thomson's multitaper approach combined with coherent plane-wave compounding to reduce speckle in ultrasound imaging.
    Toulemonde M; Basset O; Tortoli P; Cachard C
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Feb; 56():390-8. PubMed ID: 25262843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attenuation estimation with the zero-crossing technique: phantom studies.
    Ophir J; Ghouse MA; Ferrari LA
    Ultrason Imaging; 1985 Apr; 7(2):122-32. PubMed ID: 3909600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The combined effect of spatial compounding and nonlinear filtering on the speckle reduction in ultrasound images.
    Adam D; Beilin-Nissan S; Friedman Z; Behar V
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Feb; 44(2):166-81. PubMed ID: 16343578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diffraction correction for focused transducers in attenuation measurements in vivo.
    Laugier P; Berger G; Fink M; Perrin J
    Ultrason Imaging; 1987 Oct; 9(4):248-59. PubMed ID: 3330338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correction of diffraction errors in attenuation estimation with Dynamic Beam Translation.
    Céspedes I; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1992; 18(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 1580017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Properties of acoustical speckle in the presence of phase aberration. Part II: Correlation lengths.
    Smith SW; Trahey GE; Hubbard SM; Wagner RF
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Jan; 10(1):29-51. PubMed ID: 3291367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation artifacts in speed of sound estimation in scattering media.
    Ophir J; Johnson W; Yazdi Y; Shattuck D; Mehta D
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(4):341-53. PubMed ID: 2763385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equivalence of time and aperture domain additive noise in ultrasound coherence.
    Bottenus NB; Trahey GE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 25618045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound speckle size and lesion signal to noise ratio: verification of theory.
    Smith SW; Wagner RF
    Ultrason Imaging; 1984 Apr; 6(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 6539979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compounding in synthetic aperture imaging.
    Hansen JM; Jensen JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Sep; 59(9):2054-65. PubMed ID: 23007781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Elevational spatial compounding.
    Li PC; O'Donnell M
    Ultrason Imaging; 1994 Jul; 16(3):176-89. PubMed ID: 7839557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cascaded-systems analyses and the detective quantum efficiency of single-Z x-ray detectors including photoelectric, coherent and incoherent interactions.
    Yun S; Tanguay J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041916. PubMed ID: 23556910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of varying ultrasonic attenuation.
    Claesson I; Salomonsson G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1985; 11(1):131-45. PubMed ID: 3892806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Specular reflector noise: effect and correction for in vivo attenuation estimation.
    Laugier P; Berger G; Fink M; Perrin J
    Ultrason Imaging; 1985 Oct; 7(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 3914769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.