These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21958655)

  • 1. Evoked-potential changes following discrimination learning involving complex sounds.
    Orduña I; Liu EH; Church BA; Eddins AC; Mercado E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 123(4):711-9. PubMed ID: 21958655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical responses in rats predict perceptual sensitivities to complex sounds.
    Orduña I; Mercado E; Gluck MA; Merzenich MM
    Behav Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 119(1):256-64. PubMed ID: 15727530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is discrimination training necessary to cause changes in the P2 auditory event-related brain potential to speech sounds?
    Sheehan KA; McArthur GM; Bishop DV
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):547-53. PubMed ID: 16198089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sound-Making Actions Lead to Immediate Plastic Changes of Neuromagnetic Evoked Responses and Induced β-Band Oscillations during Perception.
    Ross B; Barat M; Fujioka T
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(24):5948-5959. PubMed ID: 28539421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sustained Cortical and Subcortical Measures of Auditory and Visual Plasticity following Short-Term Perceptual Learning.
    Lau BK; Ruggles DR; Katyal S; Engel SA; Oxenham AJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0168858. PubMed ID: 28107359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evoked Response Strength in Primary Auditory Cortex Predicts Performance in a Spectro-Spatial Discrimination Task in Rats.
    Gronskaya E; von der Behrens W
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 39(31):6108-6121. PubMed ID: 31175214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related differences in auditory evoked responses during rapid perceptual learning.
    Alain C; Snyder JS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 119(2):356-66. PubMed ID: 18083619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-stage processing of sounds explains behavioral performance variations due to changes in stimulus contrast and selective attention: an MEG study.
    Kauramäki J; Jääskeläinen IP; Hänninen JL; Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Lampinen J; Sams M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46872. PubMed ID: 23071654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The time course of neural changes underlying auditory perceptual learning.
    Atienza M; Cantero JL; Dominguez-Marin E
    Learn Mem; 2002; 9(3):138-50. PubMed ID: 12075002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual learning modulates sensory evoked response during vowel segregation.
    Reinke KS; He Y; Wang C; Alain C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 17(3):781-91. PubMed ID: 14561463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. P2 enhancement from auditory discrimination training is associated with improved reaction times.
    Tong Y; Melara RD; Rao A
    Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1297():80-8. PubMed ID: 19651109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory detection learning is accompanied by plasticity in the auditory evoked potential.
    Wisniewski MG; Ball NJ; Zakrzewski AC; Iyer N; Thompson ER; Spencer N
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Mar; 721():134781. PubMed ID: 32004657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of brief discrimination-training on the auditory N1 wave.
    Brattico E; Tervaniemi M; Picton TW
    Neuroreport; 2003 Dec; 14(18):2489-92. PubMed ID: 14663216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory training alters the physiological detection of stimulus-specific cues in humans.
    Tremblay KL; Shahin AJ; Picton T; Ross B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jan; 120(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 19028139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory evoked potentials dissociate rapid perceptual learning from task repetition without learning.
    Ben-David BM; Campeanu S; Tremblay KL; Alain C
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jun; 48(6):797-807. PubMed ID: 21054432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modulation of auditory evoked responses to spectral and temporal changes by behavioral discrimination training.
    Draganova R; Wollbrink A; Schulz M; Okamoto H; Pantev C
    BMC Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 10():143. PubMed ID: 19951416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of auditory distraction on electrophysiological brain activity and performance in children aged 8-13 years.
    Gumenyuk V; Korzyukov O; Alho K; Escera C; Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 14692998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefits of fading in perceptual learning are driven by more than dimensional attention.
    Wisniewski MG; Radell ML; Church BA; Mercado E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180959. PubMed ID: 28723976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.