186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21958937)
1. Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial.
Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
J Arthroplasty; 2012 May; 27(5):667-72.e1. PubMed ID: 21958937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years.
Spencer JM; Chauhan SK; Sloan K; Taylor A; Beaver RJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Apr; 89(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 17463115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing short-term functional outcomes and knee alignment of computer-assisted navigated total knee arthroplasty.
Khan MM; Khan MW; Al-Harbi HH; Weening BS; Zalzal PK
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 21704485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement.
Hoffart HE; Langenstein E; Vasak N
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 22323685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: aspects of a single unit's experience of 777 cases.
Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 21675934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional component alignment and functional outcome in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study comparing two navigation systems.
Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1285-90. PubMed ID: 21316913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early adverse results with bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort comparison to total knee arthroplasty.
Morrison TA; Nyce JD; Macaulay WB; Geller JA
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6 Suppl):35-9. PubMed ID: 21704484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the outcome of computer-assisted total knee replacement.
Decking R; Markmann Y; Mattes T; Puhl W; Scharf HP
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17623604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No differences in mid- to long-term outcomes of computer-assisted navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.
Lee DY; Park YJ; Hwang SC; Park JS; Kang DG
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Oct; 28(10):3183-3192. PubMed ID: 31784782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of retaining a patellar prosthesis on pain, functional, and satisfaction outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty.
Masri BA; Meek RM; Greidanus NV; Garbuz DS
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Dec; 21(8):1169-74. PubMed ID: 17162177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimized functional femoral rotation in navigated total knee arthroplasty considering ligament tension.
Walde TA; Bussert J; Sehmisch S; Balcarek P; Stürmer KM; Walde HJ; Frosch KH
Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 20061156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty improve the overall component position and patient function?
Allen CL; Hooper GJ; Oram BJ; Wells JE
Int Orthop; 2014 Feb; 38(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 23842630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Clinical Outcome of Computer-Navigated Compared with Conventional Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Long-Term Study.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jun; 99(12):989-996. PubMed ID: 28632587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized trial of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: impact on clinical and radiographic outcomes.
Hiscox CM; Bohm ER; Turgeon TR; Hedden DR; Burnell CD
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1259-64. PubMed ID: 21592721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of limb alignment, component positioning, and function in primary total knee arthroplasty using a pinless navigation technique compared with conventional methods.
Keyes BJ; Markel DC; Meneghini RM
J Knee Surg; 2013 Apr; 26(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 23288760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty.
Dossett HG; Swartz GJ; Estrada NA; LeFevre GW; Kwasman BG
Orthopedics; 2012 Feb; 35(2):e160-9. PubMed ID: 22310400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Bone morphing system for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty].
Wu H; van Driessche S; Goutallier D
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 22(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 18361228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of electromagnetic navigation in total knee arthroplasty on knee kinematics during functional activities using flexible electrogoniometry.
Smith JR; Rowe PJ; Blyth M; Jones B
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Jan; 28(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 23083704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morbidity of navigated vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective review of 327 cases.
Graham DJ; Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1224-7. PubMed ID: 21477971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
