248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21959071)
1. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of titrated oral misoprostol and a conventional oral regimen for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Thaisomboon A; Russameecharoen K; Wanitpongpan P; Phattanachindakun B; Changnoi A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Jan; 116(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 21959071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor.
Rouzi AA; Alsahly N; Alamoudi R; Almansouri N; Alsinani N; Alkafy S; Rozzah R; Abduljabbar H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):405.e1-405.e6. PubMed ID: 27986461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
Souza AS; Feitosa FE; Costa AA; Pereira AP; Carvalho AS; Paixão RM; Katz L; Amorim MM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 123(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 24112746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Titrated oral misoprostol for augmenting labour to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Vogel JP; West HM; Dowswell T
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):CD010648. PubMed ID: 24058051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomization of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in a low resource setting.
Adeniyi AA; Odukogbe AA; Olayemi A; Oladokun O; Adeniji AO; Aimakhu CO; Enakpene C
Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 24714004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Fisher SA; Mackenzie VP; Davies GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):906-10. PubMed ID: 11641676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.
Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 8694043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Diro M; Adra A; Gilles JM; Nassar A; Rodriguez A; Salamat SM; Beydoun SN; O'Sullivan MJ; Yasin SY; Burkett G
J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 10338065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
Mbaluka CM; Kamau K; Karanja JG; Mugo N
East Afr Med J; 2014 Sep; 91(9):303-10. PubMed ID: 26866082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol solution between nulliparous and multiparous women.
Cheng SY; Hsue CS; Hwang GH; Chen W; Li TC
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Feb; 36(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20178530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 25 µg sublingual and 50 µg intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor: a randomized controlled equivalence trial.
Sharami SH; Milani F; Faraji R; Bloukimoghadam K; Salamat F; Momenzadeh S; Ebrahimi H
Arch Iran Med; 2014 Oct; 17(10):652-6. PubMed ID: 25305762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening.
Charoenkul S; Sripramote M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1026-34. PubMed ID: 11075969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
