These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21959223)

  • 1. Development of the RTI item bank on risk of bias and precision of observational studies.
    Viswanathan M; Berkman ND
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 65(2):163-78. PubMed ID: 21959223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement.
    Hoy D; Brooks P; Woolf A; Blyth F; March L; Bain C; Baker P; Smith E; Buchbinder R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 65(9):934-9. PubMed ID: 22742910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new risk of bias checklist applicable to randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews was developed and validated to be used for systematic reviews focusing on drug adverse events.
    Faillie JL; Ferrer P; Gouverneur A; Driot D; Berkemeyer S; Vidal X; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Huerta C; Castells X; Rottenkolber M; Schmiedl S; Sabaté M; Ballarín E; Ibáñez L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():168-175. PubMed ID: 28487158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychosocial consequences of cancer cachexia: the development of an item bank.
    Häne H; Oberholzer R; Walker J; Hopkinson JB; de Wolf-Linder S; Strasser F
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2013 Dec; 46(6):795-806. PubMed ID: 23602324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures?
    Frost MH; Reeve BB; Liepa AM; Stauffer JW; Hays RD;
    Value Health; 2007; 10 Suppl 2():S94-S105. PubMed ID: 17995479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.
    Vandenbroucke JP; von Elm E; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC; Mulrow CD; Pocock SJ; Poole C; Schlesselman JJ; Egger M;
    Epidemiology; 2007 Nov; 18(6):805-35. PubMed ID: 18049195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 4: observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Singh V; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(1):73-108. PubMed ID: 19165298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions--agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program.
    Owens DK; Lohr KN; Atkins D; Treadwell JR; Reston JT; Bass EB; Chang S; Helfand M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):513-23. PubMed ID: 19595577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The regression effect as a neglected source of bias in nonrandomized intervention trials and systematic reviews of observational studies.
    Weeks DL
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Sep; 30(3):254-65. PubMed ID: 17693618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity.
    Kim SY; Park JE; Lee YJ; Seo HJ; Sheen SS; Hahn S; Jang BH; Son HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 66(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 23337781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank.
    Haley SM; Ni P; Hambleton RK; Slavin MD; Jette AM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 59(11):1174-82. PubMed ID: 17027428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews incorporating evidence from nonrandomized study designs: reasons for caution when estimating health effects.
    Reeves BC; van Binsbergen J; van Weel C
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Aug; 59 Suppl 1():S155-61. PubMed ID: 16052184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Administrative database research has unique characteristics that can risk biased results.
    van Walraven C; Austin P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 65(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 22075111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reporting of observational research studies in dermatology journals: a literature-based study.
    Langan S; Schmitt J; Coenraads PJ; Svensson A; von Elm E; Williams H;
    Arch Dermatol; 2010 May; 146(5):534-41. PubMed ID: 20479302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological quality of research on cognitive rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury.
    Cicerone KD; Azulay J; Trott C
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S52-9. PubMed ID: 19892075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.