These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21959223)

  • 21. Using a fluoridated supplement with a high fluoride concentration in children aged under 6 years may increase the risk of fluorosis.
    Rasines G
    Evid Based Dent; 2010; 11(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 20348888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An item bank was created to improve the measurement of cancer-related fatigue.
    Lai JS; Cella D; Dineen K; Bode R; Von Roenn J; Gershon RC; Shevrin D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 58(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 15680754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Limited evidence for effects of diet for type 2 diabetes from systematic reviews.
    van de Laar FA; Akkermans RP; van Binsbergen JJ
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2007 Aug; 61(8):929-37. PubMed ID: 17251927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measuring the effects of medical interventions.
    Kessler RC; Mroczek DK
    Med Care; 1995 Apr; 33(4 Suppl):AS109-19. PubMed ID: 7723439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bias in research.
    Agabegi SS; Stern PJ
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 May; 37(5):242-8. PubMed ID: 18587501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interrater reliability of grading strength of evidence varies with the complexity of the evidence in systematic reviews.
    Berkman ND; Lohr KN; Morgan LC; Kuo TM; Morton SC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 66(10):1105-1117.e1. PubMed ID: 23993312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A newly developed tool for classifying study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed substantial reliability and validity.
    Seo HJ; Kim SY; Lee YJ; Jang BH; Park JE; Sheen SS; Hahn SK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():200-5. PubMed ID: 26408805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development, content validation, and reliability of the Assessment of Real-World Observational Studies (ArRoWS) critical appraisal tool.
    Coles B; Tyrer F; Hussein H; Dhalwani N; Khunti K
    Ann Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 55():57-63.e15. PubMed ID: 33011384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the RTI item bank.
    Margulis AV; Pladevall M; Riera-Guardia N; Varas-Lorenzo C; Hazell L; Berkman ND; Viswanathan M; Perez-Gutthann S
    Clin Epidemiol; 2014; 6():359-68. PubMed ID: 25336990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Critical appraisal of studies using laboratory animal models.
    O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM
    ILAR J; 2014; 55(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 25541543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases.
    Shamliyan T; Kane RL; Dickinson S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1061-70. PubMed ID: 20728045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. General concepts in biostatistics and clinical epidemiology: observational studies with cohort design.
    Lazcano G; Papuzinski C; Madrid E; Arancibia M
    Medwave; 2019 Dec; 19(11):e7748. PubMed ID: 31999676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bias in observational study designs: cross sectional studies.
    Sedgwick P
    BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1286. PubMed ID: 25747413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of a Methodological Quality Criteria List for Observational Studies: The Observational Study Quality Evaluation.
    Drukker M; Weltens I; van Hooijdonk CFM; Vandenberk E; Bak M
    Front Res Metr Anal; 2021; 6():675071. PubMed ID: 34337310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cohort studies: part 2.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):686-7. PubMed ID: 25439220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bias in observational studies.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):542-3. PubMed ID: 24703294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Threats to validity of nonrandomized studies of postdiagnosis exposures on cancer recurrence and survival.
    Chubak J; Boudreau DM; Wirtz HS; McKnight B; Weiss NS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Oct; 105(19):1456-62. PubMed ID: 23940288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using restriction to minimize bias in observational studies.
    Turakhia MP; Heidenreich PA
    JAMA; 2010 Dec; 304(21):2359; author reply 2359-60. PubMed ID: 21119082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Study design, precision, and validity in observational studies.
    Carlson MD; Morrison RS
    J Palliat Med; 2009 Jan; 12(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 19284267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.