These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21959609)

  • 1. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions: input-output functions in neonates.
    Campos Ude P; Hatzopoulos S; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Skarzynski H; Carvallo RM
    Med Sci Monit; 2011 Oct; 17(10):CR557-62. PubMed ID: 21959609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in the Compressive Nonlinearity of the Cochlea During Early Aging: Estimates From Distortion OAE Input/Output Functions.
    Ortmann AJ; Abdala C
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 27232070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postnatal maturation of contralateral DPOAE suppression in a precocious animal model (chinchilla) of the human neonate.
    Harrison RV; Konomi U; Kanotra S; James AL
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Apr; 133(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 23373512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
    Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Neely ST; Gorga MP; Dorn PA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1499-507. PubMed ID: 14514203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in middle-aged subjects with normal versus potentially presbyacusic high-frequency hearing loss.
    Nieschalk M; Hustert B; Stoll W
    Audiology; 1998; 37(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 9547922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.
    Gorga MP; Norton SJ; Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Folsom RC; Vohr BR; Widen JE; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):400-24. PubMed ID: 11059701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physiopathological significance of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f1-f2 produced by high- versus low-level stimuli.
    Avan P; Bonfils P; Gilain L; Mom T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):430-41. PubMed ID: 12558280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements at and around 4 kHz.
    Reuven ML; Neely ST; Kopun JG; Rasetshwane DM; Allen JB; Tan H; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):779-88. PubMed ID: 24165303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Otoacoustic emissions and recruitment].
    Konopka W; Olszewski J
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2005; 59(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 16471192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for a bipolar change in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during contralateral acoustic stimulation in humans.
    Müller J; Janssen T; Heppelmann G; Wagner W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Dec; 118(6):3747-56. PubMed ID: 16419819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of age on contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human listeners with normal hearing.
    Kim S; Frisina DR; Frisina RD
    Audiol Neurootol; 2002; 7(6):348-57. PubMed ID: 12401966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reference data for DPOAE in healthy newborns.
    Gordts F; Naessens B; Mudde CA; Clement PA
    Scand Audiol; 2000; 29(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 10888344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.