These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21960061)

  • 21. Sample size calculator for cluster randomized trials.
    Campbell MK; Thomson S; Ramsay CR; MacLennan GS; Grimshaw JM
    Comput Biol Med; 2004 Mar; 34(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 14972631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of two bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.
    Lu B; Preisser JS; Qaqish BF; Suchindran C; Bangdiwala SI; Wolfson M
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):935-41. PubMed ID: 17825023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reliability, effect size, and responsiveness of health status measures in the design of randomized and cluster-randomized trials.
    Diehr P; Chen L; Patrick D; Feng Z; Yasui Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Feb; 26(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15837452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Model mis-specification and overestimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Giraudeau B
    Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 15977300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. When effect sizes disagree: the case of r and d.
    McGrath RE; Meyer GJ
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):386-401. PubMed ID: 17154753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice.
    Kraemer HC; Kupfer DJ
    Biol Psychiatry; 2006 Jun; 59(11):990-6. PubMed ID: 16368078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comment on sampling error in the standardized mean difference with unequal sample sizes: avoiding potential errors in meta-analytic and primary research.
    Laczo RM; Sackett PR; Bobko P; Cortina JM
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jul; 90(4):758-64. PubMed ID: 16060792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When should one adjust for measurement error in baseline variables in observational studies?
    Walter SD; Forbes A; Chan S; Macaskill P; Irwig L
    Biom J; 2011 Feb; 53(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 21259307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance of a mixed effects logistic regression model for binary outcomes with unequal cluster size.
    Heo M; Leon AC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):513-26. PubMed ID: 15920895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Invited review: Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology.
    St-Pierre NR
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Apr; 84(4):741-55. PubMed ID: 11352149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of the Gould-Shih procedure for sample size re-estimation.
    Waksman JA
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 17133631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adaptive statistical analysis following sample size modification based on interim review of effect size.
    Hung HM; Cui L; Wang SJ; Lawrence J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):693-706. PubMed ID: 16022173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing the impact of attrition in randomized controlled trials.
    Hewitt CE; Kumaravel B; Dumville JC; Torgerson DJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1264-70. PubMed ID: 20573482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A meta-analysis and critical review of the effects of conventional neuroleptic treatment on cognition in schizophrenia: opening a closed book.
    Mishara AL; Goldberg TE
    Biol Psychiatry; 2004 May; 55(10):1013-22. PubMed ID: 15121486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Incorporating cost in power analysis for three-level cluster-randomized designs.
    Konstantopoulos S
    Eval Rev; 2009 Aug; 33(4):335-57. PubMed ID: 19509118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How many do I need? Basic principles of sample size estimation.
    Devane D; Begley CM; Clarke M
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 Aug; 47(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 15238124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses.
    Brok J; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 18411040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.