These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2196038)

  • 1. Ganzfeld blankout occurs in bowl perimetry and is eliminated by translucent occlusion.
    Fuhr PS; Hershner TA; Daum KM
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1990 Jul; 108(7):983-8. PubMed ID: 2196038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of ocular dominance on visual field testing.
    Spry PG; Furber JE; Harrad RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 79(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11871400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frosted cylindrical lens induced artefact on Humphrey automated perimetry.
    Sreenivasan V; Ve Ramesh S; George R; Baskaran M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2006 Jan; 89(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 16430437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new pattern electroretinogram paradigm evaluated in terms of user friendliness and agreement with perimetry.
    Yang A; Swanson WH
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Apr; 114(4):671-9. PubMed ID: 17398319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of dichoptic adaptation on frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Anderson AJ; Johnson CA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 79(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 11868852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients.
    Blumenthal EZ; Sample PA; Zangwill L; Lee AC; Kono Y; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10704545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest variability of blue-on-yellow perimetry is greater than white-on-white perimetry in normal subjects.
    Kwon YH; Park HJ; Jap A; Ugurlu S; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 126(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 9683146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Background illumination and automated perimetry.
    Klewin KM; Radius RL
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Mar; 104(3):395-7. PubMed ID: 3754130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long- and short-term variability of automated perimetry results in patients with optic neuritis and healthy subjects.
    Wall M; Johnson CA; Kutzko KE; Nguyen R; Brito C; Keltner JL
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1998 Jan; 116(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 9445208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparing the ranges of defect measured with standard white on white and Pulsar perimetries].
    González de la Rosa M; González-Hernández M; García-Feijoo J; Sánchez Méndez M; García-Sánchez J
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2011 Apr; 86(4):113-7. PubMed ID: 21569920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual "blankout" of monocular homogeneous fields (Ganzfelder) is prevented with binocular viewing.
    Bolanowski SJ; Doty RW
    Vision Res; 1987; 27(6):967-82. PubMed ID: 3660657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Static fundus perimetry in normals. Microperimeter 1 versus SLO].
    Springer C; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmologe; 2006 Mar; 103(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 16091926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning effect and test-retest variability of pulsar perimetry.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Parisi L; Johnson CA; Sampaolesi R; Brusini P
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Mar; 22(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22027935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parallel rarebits: a novel, large-scale visual field screening method.
    Lin SR; Fijalkowski N; Lin BR; Li F; Singh K; Chang RT
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 25331077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects.
    Thomas D; Thomas R; Muliyil JP; George R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 11384569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparitive study of the threshold variability between blue-on-yellow perimetry and white-on-white perimetry].
    Zhong Y; Ye W; Gao J; Yu F; Wang K
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2002 Jun; 18(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 15510643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects.
    Noval S; Contreras I; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Ruiz de Zárate B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16329059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Variations in Posner's test for diagnosis of dissociated strabismus].
    González-González JM; Arroyo-Yllanes ME; Pérez-Pérez JF
    Cir Cir; 2013; 81(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 25063893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.