152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21960398)
21. Detection of occult metastatic lymph nodes in the neck with gray-scale and power Doppler US.
Wang Q; Takashima S; Takayama F; Wang JC; Kawakami S; Saito A; Matsushita T; Sone S
Acta Radiol; 2001 May; 42(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 11350291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Combination of helical CT and Doppler sonography in the follow-up of patients with clinical N0 stage neck disease and oral cancer.
Eida S; Sumi M; Yonetsu K; Kimura Y; Nakamura T
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Mar; 24(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 12637273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Change of sonographic findings on cervical lymph nodes before and after preoperative radiotherapy.
Chikui T; Yuasa K; Tokumori K; Kanda S; Kunitake N; Nakamura K; Nagata T; Hiraki A
Eur Radiol; 2004 Jul; 14(7):1255-62. PubMed ID: 14722729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Dangore SB; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 18460573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Distribution of intranodal vessels in differentiating benign from metastatic neck nodes.
Ahuja AT; Ying M; Ho SS; Metreweli C
Clin Radiol; 2001 Mar; 56(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 11247696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic Accuracy of Computer-Aided Assessment of Intranodal Vascularity in Distinguishing Different Causes of Cervical Lymphadenopathy.
Ying M; Cheng SC; Ahuja AT
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):2010-6. PubMed ID: 27131839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of metastases and reactive lymph nodes in Doppler sonography using an ultrasound contrast enhancer.
Mäurer J; Willam C; Schroeder R; Hidajad N; Hell B; Bier J; Weber S; Felix R
Invest Radiol; 1997 Aug; 32(8):441-6. PubMed ID: 9258731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cervical lymph nodes with or without metastases from oral squamous carcinoma: a correlation of MRI findings and histopathologic architecture.
Fukunari F; Okamura K; Zeze R; Kagawa T; Hashimoto K; Yuasa K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):890-9. PubMed ID: 20299250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of sentinel lymph node size and shape as a predictor of occult metastasis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
Langhans L; Bilde A; Charabi B; Therkildsen MH; von Buchwald C
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jan; 270(1):249-54. PubMed ID: 22331260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Detection of the sentinal node in squamous-cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Preliminary study].
Bénateau H; Babin E; Soubeyrand E; Nicolas J; Blaizot X; Comoz F; Béquignon A; Bouvard G; Compère JF; Chesnay E
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2005 Nov; 106(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 16292222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Differentiation of abdominal lymphadenoptahy with power Doppler sonography].
Neumann-Silkow H; Görg C
Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 20084598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Differentiation Between Malignant and Benign Lymph Nodes: Role of Superb Microvascular Imaging in the Evaluation of Cervical Lymph Nodes.
Sim JK; Lee JY; Hong HS
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):3025-3036. PubMed ID: 30945325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of sonography and CT for differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Sumi M; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 11264102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography.
Na DG; Lim HK; Byun HS; Kim HD; Ko YH; Baek JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1311-6. PubMed ID: 9129432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Thermochemoradiation therapy using superselective intra-arterial infusion via superficial temporal and occipital arteries for oral cancer with N3 cervical lymph node metastases.
Mitsudo K; Koizumi T; Iida M; Iwai T; Oguri S; Yamamoto N; Itoh Y; Kioi M; Hirota M; Tohnai I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):e639-45. PubMed ID: 22543212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic factors of cervical node status in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Burusapat C; Jarungroongruangchai W; Charoenpitakchai M
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():51. PubMed ID: 25889704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of cervical lymph node vascularity: a comparison of colour Doppler, power Doppler and 3-D power Doppler sonography.
Ahuja AT; Ying M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 30(12):1557-64. PubMed ID: 15617828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Color-coded duplex sonography of the cervical lymph nodes: improved differential diagnostic assessment after administration of the signal enhancer SH U 508A (Levovist).
Rickert D; Jecker P; Metzler V; Lehmann T; Ernst E; Westhofen M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 257(8):453-8. PubMed ID: 11073198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Change of angiostructure and hemodynamics in lymph node metastases in rabbits.
Chikui T; Yuasa K; Maemura S; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Mar; 93(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 11925547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck].
Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J
Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
