BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21960978)

  • 1. Active inference, attention, and motor preparation.
    Brown H; Friston K; Bestmann S
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():218. PubMed ID: 21960978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing biases towards the preferred hand: valid and invalid cueing of left- versus right-hand movements.
    Bestelmeyer PE; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(9):1162-7. PubMed ID: 15178168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of offset cues on saccade programming and covert attention.
    Smith DT; Casteau S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):481-490. PubMed ID: 29372674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial Attention, Motor Intention, and Bayesian Cue Predictability in the Human Brain.
    Kuhns AB; Dombert PL; Mengotti P; Fink GR; Vossel S
    J Neurosci; 2017 May; 37(21):5334-5344. PubMed ID: 28450541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Active inference under visuo-proprioceptive conflict: Simulation and empirical results.
    Limanowski J; Friston K
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4010. PubMed ID: 32132646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of action planning on spatial perception: attention matters.
    Kirsch W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Mar; 156():22-31. PubMed ID: 25617850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional bias to threat: a perceptual accuracy approach.
    Van Damme S; Crombez G; Notebaert L
    Emotion; 2008 Dec; 8(6):820-7. PubMed ID: 19102593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional bias on motor control: is motor inhibition influenced by attentional reorienting?
    Hilt PM; Cardellicchio P
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 29520490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural dynamics of object-based multifocal visual spatial attention and priming: object cueing, useful-field-of-view, and crowding.
    Foley NC; Grossberg S; Mingolla E
    Cogn Psychol; 2012 Aug; 65(1):77-117. PubMed ID: 22425615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No effect of spatial attention on the processing of a motion ensemble: Evidence from Posner cueing.
    Talipski LA; Goodhew SC; Edwards M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1845-1857. PubMed ID: 34811633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brain and Cognitive Mechanisms of Top-Down Attentional Control in a Multisensory World: Benefits of Electrical Neuroimaging.
    Matusz PJ; Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 31(3):412-430. PubMed ID: 30513045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Embodied inference and spatial cognition.
    Friston K
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S171-7. PubMed ID: 22843089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value-driven attentional capture in neglect.
    Bourgeois A; Saj A; Vuilleumier P
    Cortex; 2018 Dec; 109():260-271. PubMed ID: 30391880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Covert orienting of attention in macaques. I. Effects of behavioral context.
    Bowman EM; Brown VJ; Kertzman C; Schwarz U; Robinson DL
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):431-43. PubMed ID: 8360720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crossing the hands disrupts tactile spatial attention but not motor attention: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Gherri E; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2303-16. PubMed ID: 22683449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative precision of top-down attentional modulations is lower in early visual cortex compared to mid- and high-level visual areas.
    Park S; Serences JT
    J Neurophysiol; 2022 Feb; 127(2):504-518. PubMed ID: 35020526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Microsaccadic Account of Attentional Capture and Inhibition of Return in Posner Cueing.
    Tian X; Yoshida M; Hafed ZM
    Front Syst Neurosci; 2016; 10():23. PubMed ID: 27013991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disentangling attention from action in the emotional spatial cueing task.
    Mulckhuyse M; Crombez G
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(7):1223-41. PubMed ID: 24467679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.