BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21961096)

  • 61. Using text analysis software to identify determinants of inappropriate clinical question reporting and diagnostic procedure referrals in Reggio Emilia, Italy.
    Venturelli F; Ottone M; Pignatti F; Bellocchio E; Pinotti M; Besutti G; Djuric O; Giorgi Rossi P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jan; 21(1):103. PubMed ID: 33514372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Failure of cost-benefit analysis in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
    Sonnenberg A; Bakis G
    Endosc Int Open; 2019 Nov; 7(11):E1537-E1539. PubMed ID: 31723576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. "Appropriateness of colonoscopy according to EPAGE II in a low resource setting: a cross sectional study from Sri Lanka".
    Samarakoon Y; Gunawardena N; Pathirana A; Hewage S
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 May; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 29843628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.
    Kaminski MF; Thomas-Gibson S; Bugajski M; Bretthauer M; Rees CJ; Dekker E; Hoff G; Jover R; Suchanek S; Ferlitsch M; Anderson J; Roesch T; Hultcranz R; Racz I; Kuipers EJ; Garborg K; East JE; Rupinski M; Seip B; Bennett C; Senore C; Minozzi S; Bisschops R; Domagk D; Valori R; Spada C; Hassan C; Dinis-Ribeiro M; Rutter MD
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2017 Apr; 5(3):309-334. PubMed ID: 28507745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Appropriateness of colonoscopy requests according to EPAGE-II in the Spanish region of Catalonia.
    Marzo-Castillejo M; Almeda J; Mascort JJ; Cunillera O; Saladich R; Nieto R; Piñeiro P; Llagostera M; Cantero F; Segarra M; Puente D
    BMC Fam Pract; 2015 Oct; 16():154. PubMed ID: 26498043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Rare gastrointestinal lymphomas: The endoscopic investigation.
    Vetro C; Bonanno G; Giulietti G; Romano A; Conticello C; Chiarenza A; Spina P; Coppolino F; Cunsolo R; Raimondo FD
    World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 7(10):928-49. PubMed ID: 26265987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Colonoscopy appropriateness: Really needed or a waste of time?
    Gimeno-García AZ; Quintero E
    World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Feb; 7(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 25685265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Perforation rate in CT colonography: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.
    Bellini D; Rengo M; De Cecco CN; Iafrate F; Hassan C; Laghi A
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1487-96. PubMed ID: 24816935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A cross-sectional study of the appropriateness of colonoscopy requests in the Spanish region of Catalonia.
    Puente D; Cantero FX; Llagostera M; Piñeiro P; Nieto R; Saladich R; Mascort J; Marzo M; Almeda J; Segarra M;
    BMJ Open; 2012; 2(6):. PubMed ID: 23204141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Screening for colorectal cancer.
    Arditi C; Peytremann-Bridevaux I; Burnand B; Eckardt VF; Bytzer P; Agréus L; Dubois RW; Vader JP; Froehlich F; Pittet V; Schusselé Filliettaz S; Juillerat P; Gonvers JJ;
    Endoscopy; 2009 Mar; 41(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 19280531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Appropriateness of the indication for colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hassan C; Di Giulio E; Marmo R; Zullo A; Annibale B
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2011 Sep; 20(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 21961096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Appropriateness of the indication for upper endoscopy: a meta-analysis.
    Di Giulio E; Hassan C; Marmo R; Zullo A; Annibale B
    Dig Liver Dis; 2010 Feb; 42(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 19497799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Clinical validation of the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE) II criteria in an open-access unit: a prospective study.
    Gimeno García AZ; González Y; Quintero E; Nicolás-Pérez D; Adrián Z; Romero R; Alarcón Fernández O; Hernández M; Carrillo M; Felipe V; Díaz J; Ramos L; Moreno M; Jiménez-Sosa A
    Endoscopy; 2012 Jan; 44(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 22109649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Appropriateness of colonoscopy using the ASGE guidelines: experience in a large Asian hospital.
    Chan TH; Goh KL
    Chin J Dig Dis; 2006; 7(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 16412034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy II guidelines help in selecting and prioritizing patients referred to colonoscopy--a quality control study.
    Eskeland SL; Dalén E; Sponheim J; Lind E; Brunborg C; de Lange T
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):492-500. PubMed ID: 24597781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.