These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21961846)

  • 61. Our path to a filmless future.
    Adair L; Ledermann E
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Feb; 25(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 21748412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Construction of a quality assurance system for images in general radiography in a filmless environment: construction of an accurate and swift workflow].
    Yamada E; Kishimoto K; Kusumi K; Kimura T; Sawai A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(9):1209-15. PubMed ID: 21937845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Filmless magnetic resonance tomography. Advantages and disadvantages in comparison with film reports].
    Vorbeck F; al-Zayer F; Jung B; Breitenseher M; Imhof H
    Radiologe; 1999 Apr; 39(4):276-81. PubMed ID: 10337696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Gastrointestinal imaging: a systems analysis comparing digital and conventional techniques.
    Chawla S; Levine MS; Laufer I; Gingold EL; Kelly TJ; Langlotz CP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1279-84. PubMed ID: 10227502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Radiographic Evaluation During Treatment of Pediatric Forearm Fractures: Implications on Clinical Care and Cost.
    Luther G; Miller P; Waters PM; Bae DS
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2016; 36(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 25887819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Impact of filmless imaging on the frequency of clinician review of radiology images.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper F; Protopapas Z
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):149-50. PubMed ID: 9735455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The Effectiveness of Cost Reduction with Charge Displays on Test Ordering under the Health Insurance System in Japan: A Study Using Paper-based Simulated Cases for Residents and Clinical Fellows.
    Hirota Y; Suzuki S; Ohira Y; Shikino K; Ikusaka M
    Intern Med; 2019 Jan; 58(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 30210103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Cost-benefit analysis of primary prevention programs for mental health at the workplace in Japan].
    Yoshimura K; Kawakami N; Tsusumi A; Inoue A; Kobayashi Y; Takeuchi A; Fukuda T
    Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2013; 55(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 23257469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. [Calculation of workers' health care costs].
    Rydlewska-Liszkowska I
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(6):567-71. PubMed ID: 17533995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Determination of chest x-ray cost using activity based costing approach at Penang General Hospital, Malaysia.
    Atif M; Sulaiman SA; Shafie AA; Saleem F; Ahmad N
    Pan Afr Med J; 2012; 12():40. PubMed ID: 22891098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Radiology goes filmless. What does this mean for primary care physicians?
    Naul LG; Sincleair ST
    Postgrad Med; 2001 Jun; 109(6):107-10, 113. PubMed ID: 11424340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The greening of radiology.
    Cannavo M
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Feb; 13(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 10132933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Technical cost of radiologic examinations: analysis across imaging modalities.
    Saini S; Seltzer SE; Bramson RT; Levine LA; Kelly P; Jordan PF; Chiango BF; Thrall JH
    Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):269-72. PubMed ID: 10887260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. [Cost analysis of procedural fee for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty at six Japanese hospitals].
    Chino M
    J Cardiol; 2001 Feb; 37(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 11255699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Impact of speech recognition on radiologist productivity.
    Langer SG
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Dec; 15(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 12415463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The length of time necessary to break even after converting to digital mammography.
    Hiatt MD; Carr JJ; Manning RL
    J Telemed Telecare; 2000; 6(4):222-4. PubMed ID: 11027123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Preliminary impacts of PACS technology on radiology department operations.
    Siegel E; Brown A
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1994; ():917-21. PubMed ID: 7950057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Electronic versus film imaging: cost and quality considerations.
    Vizy KN
    Radiol Manage; 1986; 8(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 10279921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The Camtronics experience with the filmless digital catheterization laboratory.
    Kapp MA; Vaughn ST
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):343-8. PubMed ID: 10453388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.