598 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21962585)
1. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
Asvanund P; Morgano SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A strain gauge analysis comparing external and internal implant-abutment connections.
Asvanund P
Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 24614880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photoelastic stress analysis of implant-tooth connected prostheses with segmented and nonsegmented abutments.
Ochiai KT; Ozawa S; Caputo AA; Nishimura RD
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 12806328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Freitas-Júnior AC; Rocha EP; Bonfante EA; Almeida EO; Anchieta RB; Martini AP; Assunção WG; Silva NR; Coelho PG
Dent Mater; 2012 Oct; 28(10):e218-28. PubMed ID: 22682782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE; Choi YG
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16399272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of implant-abutment connection design on load bearing capacity and failure mode of implants.
Dittmer S; Dittmer MP; Kohorst P; Jendras M; Borchers L; Stiesch M
J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):510-6. PubMed ID: 21910778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants.
Steinebrunner L; Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1276-84. PubMed ID: 19040443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Leutert CR; Sailer TR; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21443610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ
J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Nickenig HJ; Schäfer C; Spiekermann H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 16958689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
